Windows Only Detecting 2.8gb?

You are also continuing to point out 100% inaccurate info about Rivatuner and ATI.

Thought I would just point that out to you :p

I hope your aware ATI Tool was updated very recently with full driver signing, infact it was them that gave Rivatuner driver signing.

You may need get rid of as much traces as possible of both APP's after uninstalling as you seem to have issues.

Odd - but you said it in your second last post that it needed to be booted from F8 with driver signing switched off?

I don't have just issues - I have Vista 64 issues.;)

Take it easy, and if you call me a liar again I will sue.
 
Since when did Virtual PC not work on Vista 64? It is fully supported and functions fine.
 
Odd - but you said it in your second last post that it needed to be booted from F8 with driver signing switched off?

I don't have just issues - I have Vista 64 issues.;)

Take it easy, and if you call me a liar again I will sue.

You like me aint reading my posts correctly. ;)

Rivatuner has worked for last 3-5 builds (lost count) as of Driver Signing.

ATI Tool previous build worked by booting up with No Driver Singing (sometimes took 2 attempts as it would break console), the new build however is driver singed and works in Vista64.
 
I can't get MS VPC 2004 or MS VPC2007 to run in Vista 64 or XP Pro x64 - last system requirements I saw from Microsoft said it still wasn't compatible. If you have a download link I'll joyfully try it and recant.
 
You like me aint reading my posts correctly. ;)

Possibly.

ATI Tool previous build worked by booting up with No Driver Singing (sometimes took 2 attempts as it would break console), the new build however is driver singed and works in Vista64.

Do you have a link as the version I just downloaded didn't work. It does with F8/Load Unsigned though.

Not being funny, but this shouldn't be how we have to do things. It should just work.
 
The 0.27 beta 4 does have the tabs missing like in the threads there, I have another 0.27 build (does not say beta on it) and all works fine.

I just booted to my other HDD to get you a screenie of ATI Tool running, I only got 1 boot and now I cant load Vista as my time on the SP1 Beta is dead, Im on SP1 RC1 now.

The 0.27 beta 4 does seem to be missing a few tabs.
 
Last edited:
Vista 64 is a disaster for enthusiasts - LOADS of stuff won't run because of the unsigned driver issue.

No CoreTemp (although PCWizard 2008 runs fine)
No TAT
No graphics card overclocking tools (that I have found yet)
No RAMDisk
No Virtual Machine
No SandboxIE
(the last three are hugely useful for software developers as they allow a completely decoupled development environment)

Now, I do appreciate that I can boot my machine with signed drivers switched off by using F8 during boot, but as I like to run my machines permanently 'up' they crash when Windows discovers the unsigned drivers and decides to overwrite them with 'good' code. Very definitely not stable behaviour.

I've been a Microsoft platform developer for almost 15 years now - using everything from Windows 3.1 and DOS onwards and Vista is now so difficult to develop applications for (unless you are using Microsoft's own crippled tools) that I'm genuinely considering giving up. I can appreciate that they want to kill off 3rd Party RAD tools, but the prospect of being forced to develop for .Net rather than at the assembly code level just annoys me.
I thought there was some kind of crack for Coretemp for Vista?
 
I mean, there is a version that will run without any tinkering with a hacked certificate available.

It will run without any settings being changed.
 
I mean, there is a version that will run without any tinkering with a hacked certificate available.

It will run without any settings being changed.

It comes with a bat file that loads the driver then you can run coretemp as required.

:)
 
Back
Top Bottom