Workstation grade Linux?

Soldato
Joined
1 Nov 2007
Posts
5,613
Location
England
I know there is technically no such thing as a workstation-grade Linux, but I'm talking about distributions with long support cycles and possibly commercial support. Things like RHEL, Ubuntu LTS and SUSE Enterprise Linux.

Which would you use? Which has the best commercial support? I need a base distribution that supports AMD FirePro or AMD Quadro graphics cards and allows for the sharing of the GPU with virtual machines running KVM and QEMU. I'd probably be using an AMD Threadripper CPU or an AMD EPYC CPU. I haven't made up my mind yet as to which would be best.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
29,524
Location
Surrey
I would expect Red Hat Enterprise Linux to have the best support in the enterprise. It's also now owned by IBM. So maybe look at Fedora or CentOS for a free compatible version.

Another option would be SuSE which is also used in some enterprises.

From what you describe I would probably try CentOS first.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
1 Nov 2007
Posts
5,613
Location
England
I would expect Red Hat Enterprise Linux to have the best support in the enterprise. It's also now owned by IBM. So maybe look at Fedora or CentOS for a free compatible version.

Another option would be SuSE which is also used in some enterprises.

From what you describe I would probably try CentOS first.

I ended up going with OpenSUSE Leap 15,1 which can be upgraded to the commercial version at any time. So far I am pretty impressed with the distribution. I have also changed web browsers to Firefox in the move so a few things to get used to. I haven't used KDE in years, I've been a GNOME user on Ubuntu for most of the time so that is a nice change. I'm pretty impressed with how fast things run on my laptop.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
29,524
Location
Surrey
I ended up going with OpenSUSE Leap 15,1 which can be upgraded to the commercial version at any time. So far I am pretty impressed with the distribution. I have also changed web browsers to Firefox in the move so a few things to get used to. I haven't used KDE in years, I've been a GNOME user on Ubuntu for most of the time so that is a nice change. I'm pretty impressed with how fast things run on my laptop.
I use Kubuntu and really love the KDE Plasma desktop. I find it much more responsive than Gnome, probably because Gnome relies in a lot of javascript extensions.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
1 Nov 2007
Posts
5,613
Location
England
I'm just updating this thread. I'm enjoying OpenSUSE Leap 15.1. It is taking me a little while to adapt from Ubuntu, but I think this is the distribution I'm going to stick with for the foreseeable future. I'm even thinking about purchasing the commercial support and converting to the commercial version of SUSE proper for a bit of added safety.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
29,524
Location
Surrey
I'm just updating this thread. I'm enjoying OpenSUSE Leap 15.1. It is taking me a little while to adapt from Ubuntu, but I think this is the distribution I'm going to stick with for the foreseeable future. I'm even thinking about purchasing the commercial support and converting to the commercial version of SUSE proper for a bit of added safety.
Good on you. Not enough people contribute financially to open source projects. Many years ago I paid for SuSE Professional before moving on to various other distros. I've settled on Kubuntu for a while so periodically donate to KDE.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
1 Nov 2007
Posts
5,613
Location
England
Good on you. Not enough people contribute financially to open source projects. Many years ago I paid for SuSE Professional before moving on to various other distros. I've settled on Kubuntu for a while so periodically donate to KDE.

£75 a year for full technical support 5 hours a day seems to be a pretty good deal to me. At least I'd have someone able to help me if I get into any problems.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Oct 2005
Posts
8,706
Location
Nottingham
Personally, for a desktop I'd probably run Fedora, (if its good enough for my friends at Red Hat to run on their work laptops ...). Don't really find RHEL a great desktop due to its focus on being a stable server over a desktop experience (hell probably nigh on 100% of my installs don't have the desktop elements even installed).

As for CentOS ... its fine but why not get a free Red Hat Developer account which comes with access to run RHEL with self support (which gives you access to their very good knowledgebase) for the same cost.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
1 Nov 2007
Posts
5,613
Location
England
Personally, for a desktop I'd probably run Fedora, (if its good enough for my friends at Red Hat to run on their work laptops ...). Don't really find RHEL a great desktop due to its focus on being a stable server over a desktop experience (hell probably nigh on 100% of my installs don't have the desktop elements even installed).

As for CentOS ... its fine but why not get a free Red Hat Developer account which comes with access to run RHEL with self support (which gives you access to their very good knowledgebase) for the same cost.

For some reason I've never got on with Red Hat based distributions. It is probably ignorance on my part but I've tended to avoid them. I also want to be able to run the same distribution on my laptop as I am running on the server so that I get comfortable doing lots of different tasks on the same distribution. OpenSUSE really does feel like a good choice so far.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
1 Nov 2007
Posts
5,613
Location
England
I've just installed the latest Nvidia drivers, and it has made a huge difference in how things feel. It is a shame the open-source Nvidia drivers suck so badly and that you need to install the latest binary drivers but since I want to use this computer for gaming and virtualisation, I need to have the official Nvidia drivers running.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 May 2010
Posts
22,376
Location
London
I'm now leaning towards Ubuntu LTS. It probably offers the best balance for a workstation distro.

I like Fedora more but.... the whole snaps/flatpacks are a mess.

I find Ubuntu 1910 heavy and also buggy, I have experienced an endless boot more than once as well as buggy system apps.

I am the type of person that needs cutting edge, but I think it makes sense for me to use the LTS version of Ubuntu for my workstation.

It is also quite snappy in comparison to 1910 version.

---

Cant stop distro hoping at the moment. But Fedora is nice. I like the stock Gnome over the Ubuntu theme.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom