With the World Cup over early for us yet again, it got me thinking about what other things about the World Cup had been a dissapointment. Most are fairly obvious anyway but i'll start with the most obvious.
England - Self explanatory. Playing decent football and going out in the quarter finals would have been unacceptable. We didn't even manage that.
Spain - Yet again they fall short, this time after being so impressive in the early stages. At least it's not just us who can't make a half decent football team from a set of great players.
Ronaldinho - We know how good he is, which makes it seem much worse when he puts in a performance not up to standard. Very surprised at his poor showing at this WC.
Referees - The players should take a fair part of the blame on this one, but when a referee issues a player with 3 yellow cards in the same game, he makes a laughing stock of himself and football. Some of the decisions in this tournament have been unbelievable at times, I can think of at least 2 teams that have fair cases to say the ref was a major factor in them being knocked out.
Portugal/France/Italy/Germany - None of theses teams are anywhere near the best in the world, yet one of them will be crowned world champions. When the inevitable happens and we go out, I at least like to see the best team go on and win it. That wont happen this time.
Diving, play acting, cheating - It's been going on for a while now and seems to have culminated in the worst World Cup ever for cheating. Why do players have no shame in going down as if they have been nutted, when no contact has been made at all? (Prime example Maniche against England)
The fact that FIFA still does nothing about cheating - This is probably worse than the cheating itself now. We all know cheating happens, we can all see it plain as day on the tv, fair enough if they ref misses a few, but for FIFA to take no action retrospectively, even when there is so much evidence, ridiculous.
What other things about WC 2006 do people think have been a let down?
England - Self explanatory. Playing decent football and going out in the quarter finals would have been unacceptable. We didn't even manage that.
Spain - Yet again they fall short, this time after being so impressive in the early stages. At least it's not just us who can't make a half decent football team from a set of great players.
Ronaldinho - We know how good he is, which makes it seem much worse when he puts in a performance not up to standard. Very surprised at his poor showing at this WC.
Referees - The players should take a fair part of the blame on this one, but when a referee issues a player with 3 yellow cards in the same game, he makes a laughing stock of himself and football. Some of the decisions in this tournament have been unbelievable at times, I can think of at least 2 teams that have fair cases to say the ref was a major factor in them being knocked out.
Portugal/France/Italy/Germany - None of theses teams are anywhere near the best in the world, yet one of them will be crowned world champions. When the inevitable happens and we go out, I at least like to see the best team go on and win it. That wont happen this time.
Diving, play acting, cheating - It's been going on for a while now and seems to have culminated in the worst World Cup ever for cheating. Why do players have no shame in going down as if they have been nutted, when no contact has been made at all? (Prime example Maniche against England)
The fact that FIFA still does nothing about cheating - This is probably worse than the cheating itself now. We all know cheating happens, we can all see it plain as day on the tv, fair enough if they ref misses a few, but for FIFA to take no action retrospectively, even when there is so much evidence, ridiculous.
What other things about WC 2006 do people think have been a let down?

