WWI centenary

Soldato
Joined
4 Feb 2003
Posts
6,140
Location
Birmingham
I just saw this article on the BBC website:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19904844

and I applaud and think it is only right that we mark 2014 as the centenary of the start of The Great War in a special way. I'm just not sure that it should be on Rememberance day 2014. Rememberace Day as we all know falls on the 11th November to coincide with the official cessation of hostilities in 1918 and it just seems innapropriate to use the same day to mark the start of what would become one of the biggest social, political and financial change events of the modern era, surely it is only right that 28th July or even more accurately 4th August are set aside as the memorial to this momentus event.

I know 11th November is the dedicated day for rememberance and adding anymore onto the calender can cause disruption but 11th November is the day for remembering all our lost not just those of 1914-18 War, also I think the 2018 Remeberance day should be the one where mark a centenary as that is exactly what it would be.

On top of all this I think important days over the years 2014-2018 should be given over to educate and mark important centenary events, just for example:

19th January 1915 -Zeppelin Bombing of Great Yarmouth by Zeppelin L.3 the first Air Raid on Britain
1st July 1916 -Start of the Battle of the Somme where on day one Britain suffered approximately 58,000 casualties (approx. 20,000 Dead)
15 September 1916 -Battle of Flers-Courcelette, the first time Tanks were used in Battle
7th June 1917 -Start of the Battle of Messines Ridge where 19 British mines detonated in tunnels under the German front line were so large the explosions, it is claimed, were heard in London and as far away as Dublin.

As I said those are just examples but now we no longer have a living connection to combatants of the war it is so important that we spend the 4 years setting aside time to remember the sacrifice of the people who fought in horrendous conditions (that includes sailors and airmen) and educate our young who will not have the chance to grow up with people who remember the era and hear their accounts.

If it is decided that the centenary event will only be marked on Remeberance Day 2014 I shan't complain because at least it will be marked but I will think it is an awful opportunity missed.


They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.
 
Last edited:
So many men torn from their families and homes for not very much. We are very lucky to be living in a country that is stable.

Might the end of the war be a better thing to recognise in a 'big' way?
 
I'm certain it will be as well and as I say in my opening post it would be more appropriate to mark that on the 11th November than the centenary commemoration for the start of the war.
 
You mean a celebration of why politicians like Mr. Cameron himself, order those very soldiers to their grave?

There is always a silver lining, I don't care for celebrating what soldiers may have done oh so many decades ago because really all it does is acknowledge the job of the people who send these poor boys out to kill other poor boys, just to make their statement more right.


I respect the dead silently, I don't need this.
 
They should recreate the trenches so that the yoof of today know what people had to go through.
 
How about we honour the innocent victims that died by striving towards peace & not killing other innocent civilians in dubious wars overseas to acquire minerals/oil or building contracts for the USA & avoid getting involved in further wars in the future?.
 
How about we honour the innocent victims that died by striving towards peace & not killing other innocent civilians in dubious wars overseas to acquire minerals/oil or building contracts for the USA & avoid getting involved in further wars in the future?.

wwi was all about US building contracts. You heard it here first.

** Comment removed - You're allowed you opinions but don't start getting personal **
 
Personally I don't think commemorating the start of a War that killed millions as a good thing. I would far rather commemorate the 100th Anniversary of the end of the First World War in 2018. A rather more fitting tribute to the sacrifice of countless men and women on all sides.
 
How about we honour the innocent victims that died by striving towards peace & not killing other innocent civilians in dubious wars overseas to acquire minerals/oil or building contracts for the USA & avoid getting involved in further wars in the future?.

WWI was not a dubious overseas war to acquire minerals/oil or building contracts for the USA. Do you know any history at all?
 
That is a lame excuse, one does not necessarily deny the other from existing.

No, but I don't see a lot of celebrating amongst the rows of gravestones in Belgium and France. I don't see a lot of celebrating at the Cenotaph or countless (and now sadly, often vandalised) village and town war memorials. If you think a commemoration of the beginning of one of, if not the most momentus events in the 20th Century is nothing but a political celebration then that is your own skewed political agenda creating a paradox of your own accusations.
 
Last edited:
That is a lame excuse, one does not necessarily deny the other from existing.

Maybe i am being slow, so please excuse me.

Your reply does not make any sense to me. Remembering the horror, waste, and ultimate futility of WW I is what this is about, not a celebration. You got the two confused and still do not seem to understand the difference.
 
Personally I don't think commemorating the start of a War that killed millions as a good thing. I would far rather commemorate the 100th Anniversary of the end of the First World War in 2018. A rather more fitting tribute to the sacrifice of countless men and women on all sides.

Although I do understand your sentiment, wouldn't it be better to spend the 100th anniversary of the war years educating and informing? In the media saturated world of today highlighted commemoration is a very good way to place things at the forefront of peoples thoughts and actions.
 
You mean a celebration of why politicians like Mr. Cameron himself, order those very soldiers to their grave?

Which soldiers has David Cameron sent to their deaths ? It wasn't the Tories on his watch who sent troops into Iraq and Afghanistan.

Also, and I appreciate you may not have implied it, but you could argue WWI was a more just cause than Iraq or Afghanistan.
 
Back
Top Bottom