X1300 performance

[Ace Modder]

How does a X1300 performance conmpared to the following:


9250 128MB
9800 128MB
6800GT 128MB
1600XT 128MB

 

[Things change I've changed]

How does a X1300 performance conmpared to the following:

9250 128MB
9800 128MB
X1300
6800GT 128MB
1600XT 128MB


I'd guess there.

edit - actually looking around the net I'd say there instead

 

[Ace Modder]

so about the same as a 660GT?

 

[Minstadave]

so about the same as a 660GT?

No its about 1/2 to 2/3rds as fast as a 6600GT looking at Toms Hardware Charts.

Its much slower than a 6800 Vanilla.

 

[Things change I've changed]

Heres a review and some benches of the X1300 (pro) here, http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/254/10 , thats the link to the conclusion but just click on pages 6,7,8,9, for some benches.

 

[PU7E]

the x1300 isnt a bad card iv used one before i got my x1950 and they run most games out pretty well and outperform the 6600 with ease

 

[Lolcb]

the x1300 isnt a bad card iv used one before i got my x1950 and they run most games out pretty well and outperform the 6600 with ease

 

[Minstadave]

The X1300 Pro looks to be between the 6600 and 6600GT. The X1300 non pro is loads slower:

X1300 (400 MHz / 250 MHz)
X1300 PRO (600 MHz / 400 MHz)

 

[PU7E]

yea it was the his x1300pro iv used there not bad little cards for the money but theres also a lot nicer cards aswell

 

[lay-z-boy]

I now pronounce you, Sir Spamalot

His statement is partly correct, the x1300pro sits in-between the 6600 std and 6600gt.

9250 128MB
x1300pro < --
9800 128MB
6800GT 128MB
1600XT 128MB

but it has full dx9c compliance, sm3, etc which the 9250 and 9800 don't have.

 

[silversurfer]

fyi

6474 sempron 9800xt 3dmark03.3dr
8547 3dmark03 pent805 6600gtpcie.3dr
8596 6800pci-e pentium 805 3dmark03 .3dr
10070 3dmark03 6800pcie pent805 435-723.3dr

Some previous rough results Ive had from 3DMark03 and just now:

8907 3dmark03 1600xt stock.3dr


The 1600xt runs hotter then a 9800xt though