X870 or X670?

edgedemon

edgedemon

edgedemon

Soldato
Joined
10 Oct 2005
Posts
4,192
Location
London
I could do with some help understanding the difference in available PCIe lanes and whether I even need them?

Im only considering mini-ITX right now and I want USB4
That means X670 wise Im looking at the Asus ROG Strix X670E-I
As I understand it, this mobo has 2 Promontory chipsets that give me Gen 5 connectivity for 1 x M2, gfx card and I also get additional Gen 4 x12 and Gen 3 x8 lanes.

For the equivalent X870 mobo I lose one of the promontory chipsets, still have Gen 5 connectivity for 1 x M2, gfx card, but drop to lower additional Gen 4 x8 and Gen 3 x 4 lanes.

Practically what does this actually mean? For an ITX board does this even matter as there are so few expansion slots or will I limited if I make use of the higher speed USB connectivity available on these boards?

Im just trying to understand if I might be limiting myself with X870 or for all practical things, I don't have to worry?
 
edgedemon said:
Practically what does this actually mean? For an ITX board does this even matter as there are so few expansion slots
Click to expand...
I don't think ITX needs X670E, no.

I mean, even B650E boards can have PCI-E 5.0 graphics, 1x CPU-connected PCI-E 5.0 M.2 slot (technically 2x, but they don't do it) and 2x additional M.2 slots with no impact on GPU lanes.

I believe USB4 needs 4x PCI-E 4.0 lanes, but Intel's spec for the controller on that board is 4x PCI-E 3.0.

edgedemon said:
will I limited if I make use of the higher speed USB connectivity available on these boards?
Click to expand...
That depends on what they put on the the board, but it should have no meaningful impact on the rest of it.
 
Tetras said:
I don't think ITX needs X670E, no.

I mean, even B650E boards can have PCI-E 5.0 graphics, 1x CPU-connected PCI-E 5.0 M.2 slot (technically 2x, but they don't do it) and 2x additional M.2 slots with no impact on GPU lanes.

I believe USB4 needs 4x PCI-E 4.0 lanes, but Intel's spec for the controller on that board is 4x PCI-E 3.0.


That depends on what they put on the the board, but it should have no meaningful impact on the rest of it.
Click to expand...
This will be the connectivity on offer, but from what you have said I might be OK.


Rear USB (Total 10 ports)
2 x USB4 (40Gbps) port(s)(2 x USB Type-C)
5 x USB 10Gbps port(s) (4 x Type-A + 1 x USB Type-C)
3 x USB 2.0 port(s) (3 x Type-A)
Front USB (Total 3 ports)
1 x USB 10Gbps connector (supports USB Type-C)
1 x USB 5Gbps header supports 2 additional USB 5Gbps ports
* USB Type-C power delivery output: max. 5V/3A
ROG STRIX HIVE II(Total 2 ports)
2 x USB 10Gbps port ( 1 x Type-A + 1 x USB Type-C)
ROG FPS Card (Total 3 ports)
2 x USB 2.0 headers additional 3 USB 2.0 ports

I have no idea how to map that out into available PCIe lanes to see if there is any compromise. X670 offers the same but has an additional 4 x Gen 4 and 4 x Gen 3 PCIe lanes compared to X870
 
Last edited:
edgedemon said:
I have no idea how to map that out into available PCIe lanes to see if there is any compromise. X670 offers the same but has an additional 4 x Gen 4 and 4 x Gen 3 PCIe lanes compared to X870
Click to expand...
If you look at Anandtech's launch article here, they have the block diagrams for X670/X670E/B650/B650E which shows you where the USB ports come from relative to the CPU and the chipset.

Generally speaking, if there are no exclusions/sharing listed in the manual then you're usually fine. Chipset connected stuff does share one narrow uplink to the CPU, but realistically you're not going to notice.
 
Tetras said:
If you look at Anandtech's launch article here, they have the block diagrams for X670/X670E/B650/B650E which shows you where the USB ports come from relative to the CPU and the chipset.

Generally speaking, if there are no exclusions/sharing listed in the manual then you're usually fine. Chipset connected stuff does share one narrow uplink to the CPU, but realistically you're not going to notice.
Click to expand...
Perfect! Thank you

I also found the following

Comparison

In summary

"the difference between an X870 and X670 motherboard can be fairly significant. An X870 chipset will have half the number of USB ports as an X670 and fewer free PCI-e lanes for additional networking, storage, or PCI-e slots."
 
Last edited:
edgedemon said:
In summary

"the difference between an X870 and X670 motherboard can be fairly significant. An X870 chipset will have half the number of USB ports as an X670 and fewer free PCI-e lanes for additional networking, storage, or PCI-e slots."
Click to expand...
You were talking about X670E though, right? It is important to clarify that because E and non-E are not the same, you need to make sure you're comparing like for like.
 
I think so but the same still applies. I was waiting for the x870 release but I think I might be better off with the Strix X670E-I as plain old X870 seems gimped and is basically B650 with USB 4 as far as I can see.
I guess it will come down to price and whether I can live with the clear CMOS header being on the riser card and the hive of course.
 
edgedemon said:
I think so but the same still applies. I was waiting for the x870 release but I think I might be better off with the Strix X670E-I as plain old X870 seems gimped and is basically B650 with USB 4 as far as I can see.
I guess it will come down to price and whether I can live with the clear CMOS header being on the riser card and the hive of course.
Click to expand...
I was in a similar situation, bought 2 B650E boards, both weren't ideal. One had USB4 support eating up 4 lanes so came at the loss of half the main GPU slot lanes with more than 2 M2 drives.

X670E can be had relatively cheap so I went that route. Asus TUF X670E was £210 or £230 for the wifi version with £25 rate my gear and £20 back to school cashback - but it's Asus so it's a gamble if they'll pay out, but cheap if they do!

Edit - missed you were looking at ITX.
 
Last edited:
edgedemon said:
I think so but the same still applies. I was waiting for the x870 release but I think I might be better off with the Strix X670E-I as plain old X870 seems gimped and is basically B650 with USB 4 as far as I can see.
I guess it will come down to price and whether I can live with the clear CMOS header being on the riser card and the hive of course.
Click to expand...
With X670 not having PCI-E 5.0 support, I don't know of any X670 ITX boards. My guess is that they will still use X870E instead of X870, for technical and marketing reasons.

X870 looks like B650E to me, in that table.
 
Tetras said:
With X670 not having PCI-E 5.0 support, I don't know of any X670 ITX boards. My guess is that they will still use X870E instead of X870, for technical and marketing reasons.

X870 looks like B650E to me, in that table.
Click to expand...

Joxeon said:
Yeah it looks like B650E is being rebranded to X870, no doubt to try and command a higher price.
Click to expand...


So I guess the big question for me is do I go for the X670E Strix ITX board or wait for the X870 version which is a slight downgrade and more like their (now unavailable) B650E offering.
On the X870 side is that it is a new platform, a lot of the Asus apps/features have been upgraded to version 2 (I don't know if they are board specific), there might be some microcode that will suit the 9950X more than the X670E mobo.
However it is a downgrade on the PCIe lanes side of things and a bit cheeky from Asus.
On the X670E side, Im buying the best available mini ITX mobo on the current platform that with a BIOS upgrade will support 9950X and will last me through to the end of AM5, but it isn't as new and shiny :D
It also has issues with the placement of the clear CMOS header on the riser card and BIOS flashback needing the Hive, though I think that was fixed in later BIOS. Overall these are small issues.

Unless there is a big price difference or reviews pick up on a performance increase on X870, then reading back through this post I think I have answered my question, Im better off going for the top of the current gen X670E rather than a B650E promoted to X870. Thanks OCUK - it is good to post and get help with clarifying my sometimes random thought processes.
 
Last edited:
I’d wager that the new X870 boards are going to be even more expensive than X670 so that’s a factor.

I can’t see it being worthwhile spending a lot of money on a motherboard if there’s a much cheaper one that’s good enough but it’s up to you and how much you need USB4.

Apparently, and this needs confirmation, but the new AMD boards are going to have more USB4 implementation but that remains to be seen.
 
Yesterday I was curious about the new X870/X870E and really can’t see any appeal to it.
I was expecting the possibility of populating every M2 without sacrificing lanes. Unless I’m mistaken, not yet.
 
I've purchased a x670e recently because I'm seeing a few reports the new chipset is going to be even more expensive and it's likely AMD will stop producing x670 chips shortly
 
JollyJamma said:
I’d wager that the new X870 boards are going to be even more expensive than X670 so that’s a factor.

I can’t see it being worthwhile spending a lot of money on a motherboard if there’s a much cheaper one that’s good enough but it’s up to you and how much you need USB4.

Apparently, and this needs confirmation, but the new AMD boards are going to have more USB4 implementation but that remains to be seen.
Click to expand...

It isn't just the USB4, X870 doesn't have the PCIe lanes that X670E has. If Im going to spend 400 on a mobo, I might as well get the best I can and at the moment, X670E beats X870 as there isn't currently a mini ITX version for X870E, only X870.
If X870 ITX comes in at 300 quid, then I will have another think but Im waiting to see pricing and reviews.
 
Last edited:
Raelgun said:
I've purchased a x670e recently because I'm seeing a few reports the new chipset is going to be even more expensive and it's likely AMD will stop producing x670 chips shortly
Click to expand...
I think you are right, this is a worry, Im hoping that they stop after X870 release..

I did see a leak that X870 was around the 350 mark for the ITX, I think it was videocardz, that makes it close enough to X670E that I might as well go for X670E rather than X870 (B650E)
 
edgedemon said:
I think you are right, this is a worry, Im hoping that they stop after X870 release..

I did see a leak that X870 was around the 350 mark for the ITX, I think it was videocardz, that makes it close enough to X670E that I might as well go for X670E rather than X870 (B650E)
Click to expand...
honestly its a bit depressing, finally getting reasonable access to USB4 was going to be a big boon but I wanted to know more info such as is the USB4 being fitted also display port alt. as well and 60 Watt output each port.

But if its not even that and a huge price mark up possibly, the chipset just isnt that.

I was intending to go Intel originally but the whole hardware issue just put me off.
 
edgedemon said:
On the X870 side is that it is a new platform, a lot of the Asus apps/features have been upgraded to version 2 (I don't know if they are board specific), there might be some microcode that will suit the 9950X more than the X670E mobo.
However it is a downgrade on the PCIe lanes side of things and a bit cheeky from Asus.
Click to expand...
I don't think the microcode/CPU support will be any different (apart from the BIOS being updated to support newer CPUs "out of the box"), from what I can see reported online they are just being rebranded and AMD have shuffled the deck on features.
 
The differences are usb4 and some QOL quick release pcie and M.2 which are already available on some of the current boards and higher speed memory support which which is still cpu and memory dependent and would incur the latency penalty on ryzen anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom