Man of Honour
Best way to do it nowadays is to buy with someone. However, that's quite a step for a lot of people.
Aye same to be accurate; a very good wage, but not rich, and owned her house. I moved in .Same here, whilst i wouldn't say rich she at least had her own house aready
My thinking is the money that goes towards rent could go towards mortgage repayments, that way you'd have something to show for it when all is said and done.
So you're saying find a wealthy, successful girlfriend? My current one won't think much to that.
Do you consider interest repayments on a mortgage to be "dead money" also? Early on in a mortgage, interest alone can be more than rent for an equivalent property...
As a quick example: Suppose you have a 125k house on a 7% interest mortgage. Interest alone repayments on this would be £729 per month; anything more than this you would pay off the principle value of the house ("paying back to yourself"). Now, if instead you could pay £600 per month in rent and put the rest into a saving account, then in the short term you're a lot better off. Of course, 10 years into the mortgage, when the mortgage-debt has been reduced, you'll be paying less in interest - but that's a long time away, and by then your "savings account" would be quite well stocked...
There are always financial arguments to owning your own home, but seeing renting as being "dead money" is really not the way to look at it. Unless you can drop the full payment for the house, you're always paying out money to a third party, whether it's a landlord or the bank.
But you cannot afford to buy. You'd be borrowing 5x your salary even if you could get a 50% deposit.Interest won't be £729 because you wouldn't be mortgaging the full value of the house.
And savings are pathetic at the moment, 2 and 3%, hardly going to get rich quick on those rates are we?
The attitude that rent is "dead money" is quite strange. Do you consider that paying for food is dead money? How about paying for electricity or water or gas? After all, you don't end up with assets paying for those, yet you need those to live, exactly the same as paying rent.
Stop thinking of somewhere to live as an asset and more like a service, renting soon starts to make a lot more sense.
I only have a mortgage because I bought at a good time (2000) and I am now paying considerably less than I would be if I were renting. If I had to get somewhere to live now, I wouldn't chuck my deposit away on a mortgage, I'd rather rent.
a pap example, but the logic is kind of correct.7% mortgage example nice way to tip the balance in favour of your argument.
My thinking is the money that goes towards rent could go towards mortgage repayments, that way you'd have something to show for it when all is said and done.
agreed, I made the choice because it was much cheaper to buy than rent the same property, the majority is still dead money though, on my default repayment I think I pay off £20 a month from the actual borrowed amount. Fortunately I can overpay by quite a bit without penalty.The maths doesn't stack like that though.
When you pay a mortgage, assuming it's repayment, you'll have a chunk going to interest and then a smaller chunk going to repayment. The rent payments is just as dead as the interest component on a mortgage isn't it?
The maths doesn't stack like that though.
When you pay a mortgage, assuming it's repayment, you'll have a chunk going to interest and then a smaller chunk going to repayment. The rent payments is just as dead as the interest component on a mortgage isn't it?
The maths doesn't stack like that though.
When you pay a mortgage, assuming it's repayment, you'll have a chunk going to interest and then a smaller chunk going to repayment. The rent payments is just as dead as the interest component on a mortgage isn't it?