Soldato
The agreement won't change with France. It is against international law to start shipping them over to the UK so that is why we have this agreement in place.
The agreement won't change with France. It is against international law to start shipping them over to the UK so that is why we have this agreement in place.
International law? No. This is about France doing us a favour that they're now finding onerous. If you're thinking of the first country thing: that's EU law, the Dublin Convention.
France are responsible for letting that wasp nest get out of control, it’s nothing to do with us. Just another product of the irresponsible left.
Even then international law allows the UK to return them to the first safe country I.e. France.
No one is saying they would actively send ships with immigrants on board.
However, they don't have to do anything to stop it if they wished. Once on the UK side these people become the UK's problem.
Up until now France have realised that if this was actually possible, Calais would have 10x more immigrants in the first place and so as a deterrent have had the border on their side.
Imagine having it on the UK side. They would all apply for asylum and then you would have to follow due process before being able to deport them back to their country of origin if you can even find out where that is.
France are responsible for letting that wasp nest get out of control, it’s nothing to do with us. Just another product of the irresponsible left.
No one is saying they would actively send ships with immigrants on board.
However, they don't have to do anything to stop it if they wished. Once on the UK side these people become the UK's problem.
Up until now France have realised that if this was actually possible, Calais would have 10x more immigrants in the first place and so as a deterrent have had the border on their side.
No one is saying they would actively send ships with immigrants on board.
However, they don't have to do anything to stop it if they wished. Once on the UK side these people become the UK's problem.
Up until now France have realised that if this was actually possible, Calais would have 10x more immigrants in the first place and so as a deterrent have had the border on their side.
Imagine having it on the UK side. They would all apply for asylum and then you would have to follow due process before being able to deport them back to their country of origin if you can even find out where that is.
After due process if they claim asylum.
The places they are coming from have always been war torn crapholes. The only difference now is with modern tech word spread around the world within days that sheer numbers trump EU borders. From that point on it was a feeding frenzy for any chancer from a **** country. And while the chancers are creating a rape/crime tsunami across Europe, they’re using finite resources and destroying good will for genuine refugees.Well, looking at the decades concerned, it's a fair mix, chap. Most recently: Tony and Bush went into Iraq and Afghanistan; Obama got involved in Lybia; everyone and their uncle roughhoused Syria; Israeli-Palestine stand-off never went away; civil strife in Africa across the political spectrum. Same broad spread for the foreign intelligence involvement in the region, and governments have rotated in the meantime. And not even one Corbyn character making big calls.
Stop being irresponsible with your history.
Germany's vice-chancellor has warned the future of the EU could be in doubt if the UK's exit is handled badly.
Sigmar Gabriel said the EU would go "down the drain" if other states followed Britain's lead and that the UK could not keep the "nice things" about Europe while taking no responsibility.
Mr Gabriel, who is also economy minister in Germany's governing coalition and Chancellor Angela Merkel's deputy, told a news conference that as a result, the world now regarded Europe as an unstable continent.
"Brexit is bad but it won't hurt us as much economically as some fear - it's more of a psychological problem and it's a huge problem politically," he said.
Mr Gabriel also said on Sunday that trade talks between the EU and the US had "de facto failed".
The plan - known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership or TTIP - aimed to remove or reduce a wide range of barriers to EU-US trade and investment.
However, the move has been controversial in many of countries involved, including Germany and the UK. Critics say TTIP is driven by big business and would be bad for jobs, consumers and the environment.
TTIP.. another bogus reason that was given to leave the EU.
We're going to be more exposed to a similar agreement outside of the EU.
Below are extracts from an article by Germany's vice-chancellor Sigmar Gabrielr reported by BBC online this weekend.
It quite clearly shows that Europe cannot afford to give the UK and easy ride out of the EU for critical political reasons.
which we all knew, but at the same time they can't lose us buying from them. Thus the process has to be carefully handled but can't look too inviting.
OFC other countries don't have our importing power so they will have less to bring to the table.
I just want it to hurry up as this uncertainty will keep us in a damaging limbo, at least if we leave and bottom out we can rebuild.
rape/crime tsunami
Simple enough, just stop giving a **** about what the "international community" thinks