Shackley said:
Perhaps C4 felt that the historically trivial use of the word "******" might distract attention from the contribution of the brilliant
Barnes Wallis who invented the
bouncing bomb which was used by the Dambusters and whose later work on the swing-wing concept was ignored by an ungrateful British Government and instead used in the design of the American General Dynamics F-111?
&
Shackley said:
Do you really believe that the presence of one word would significantly have altered the insight gained by the average viewer into the bravery of the men involved and the massive contribution of the brilliant
Barnes Wallis who invented the
bouncing bomb which was used by the Dambusters?
Sorry, I don't follow you.
I'm well aware of who Barnes Wallis was and his significant contribution, both to the war effort and british aircraft design. I'd happily argue that his design for the Wellington medium bomber was a far bigger contribution to the war effort than the "bouncing bomb".
I'd also suggest that the story of the aircrews that died delivering Wallis mine was far more deserving of a telling than that of Barnes Wallis himself, be it in the film or many books on the subject.
My point is the word in question was a historical fact and in the original format of the film. It's not for me to justify why it should be included, and wonder if it might upset someone so much they may not pay attention to the rest of the story. For good or for bad it was in the film and was a fact so why was it necessary to retrospectively remove it for no real justification other than the current obsession with political correctness.
I honestly don't believe anyone would be offended by it in the context of the film unless they were looking to be offended. It might be worthy of a roll of the eyes, or even a jolly good "tutting", but offended?
There is no doubt that the original film gives only a flavour of the raids and was tailored to a 1950s british view of the world rather than being a historical account. Having said that, I can't help but think that this kind of "tinkering" is the sort of thing that ends up with a generation believing the Americans captured the German Enigma code machines (as in the recent film U-571) rather than the crew of HMS Bulldog who captured U-110 in 1941
As an aside for anyone that enjoyed the film I can recommend the book "Enemy coast ahead", Wg Cdr Guy Gibsons own story of his RAF career through WWII actually written whilst he was still serving during the war.