
Everything at stock and 7.6 cats.
Should get really interesting when the engine goes multi-threaded soon, good times.
Old article from last year.

Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Then you woke up and smelt the coffee..![]()
270 FPS
16xQ CSAA + 16xAF
All High / "On"
1280x1024
max quality on everything in drivers
Vista x64 163.44
Stock GTX, x3210 at 3.2 Ghz
(cant wait to try this on my q6600 @ 3.7ghz)
Then you seen this picture and smelt my beard......
And then i still call bull, noway you get that score at those settings when an ultra and faster CPU get 230fps, oh and below is my updated bench with my 2900xt, i noticed how you can change the settings whilst keeping the previous settings benchmark score on screen, say i did the bench in low settings then changed the config panel to all high.
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6726/yuytujb8.jpg
Why would that be? 16x csaa looks very cleanyou need to start using supersampling as well![]()
126fps
E6600 @ 3.2
X1900XT 512mb (soon to be GTX OC)
4gb Ballistx
css doesn't give the max and min fps....before swapping over to my old 7950 gx2, i tested my new 2400XT. didnt tell me max or min - just average fps. do you have to go somewhere for that info?
anyways - looked good and got 58 avg : 1920x1080
Why would that be? 16x csaa looks very clean![]()
css doesn't give the max and min fps....
u could use fraps for that..
I know what supersampling is, however against csaa it seems to be a less efficient way of doing the same thing.