Everything at stock and 7.6 cats.
Should get really interesting when the engine goes multi-threaded soon, good times.
Old article from last year.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
CS:S Stress Test
- Thread starter gurusan
- Start date
Everything at stock and 7.6 cats.
Should get really interesting when the engine goes multi-threaded soon, good times.
Old article from last year.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 9,456
I get 150 FPS on my laptop. 1280x800 with everything maxed. No AA though.
Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz
2GB
8600MGT
Vista
Core 2 Duo 1.8GHz
2GB
8600MGT
Vista
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 243
- Location
- Belfast Norn Iron
Then you woke up and smelt the coffee..
Then you seen this picture and smelt my beard......
stress.jpg
Lost a few fps from having to underclock my memory as it crashed out at the setting ocuk set it too.
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 5,207
clearly i need a better processor 
270 FPS
16xQ CSAA + 16xAF
All High / "On"
1280x1024
max quality on everything in drivers
Vista x64 163.44
Stock GTX, x3210 at 3.2 Ghz
(cant wait to try this on my q6600 @ 3.7ghz)
you need to start using supersampling as well
And then i still call bull, noway you get that score at those settings when an ultra and faster CPU get 230fps, oh and below is my updated bench with my 2900xt, i noticed how you can change the settings whilst keeping the previous settings benchmark score on screen, say i did the bench in low settings then changed the config panel to all high.
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6726/yuytujb8.jpg
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 243
- Location
- Belfast Norn Iron
...and im sure you think 911 was an inside job, some ppl are never happy....
And then i still call bull, noway you get that score at those settings when an ultra and faster CPU get 230fps, oh and below is my updated bench with my 2900xt, i noticed how you can change the settings whilst keeping the previous settings benchmark score on screen, say i did the bench in low settings then changed the config panel to all high.
http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6726/yuytujb8.jpg
how your windows is set up and the drivers u use makes a lot of difference...maybe he has a tweaked config...tweaked drivers ...maybe he has tweaked windows for performance......all these things do make a lot of difference.
i got over 300 fps with a 2.4 at stock speeds and a 7800gt with no tweaking.
my fps now
not sure why my fps r reporting as high as they are but thats what its showing.
i got a 8800gts oc and e6600 (stock speed)
Why would that be? 16x csaa looks very cleanyou need to start using supersampling as well
I'm back
Just put my shiny new 8800 GTX OC in and ran the test again and got 206fps with max settings
But had to come back to work
play time tonight once the kids are asleep me thinks!!
Why would that be? 16x csaa looks very clean
cos with ss enabled it looks even better
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersampling
I know what supersampling is, however against csaa it seems to be a less efficient way of doing the same thing.
Curious what most people get in this and what their setups are?
I got 237.22 with the specs in my sig (except the 7900GT was at 675/910)...is that reasonable?
Oh and this is at 1440x900 everything on maximum
By everything on max do you mean 6xAA? Nvidia doesnt do 6xAA and defaults to having no AA whatsoever so thats probably the reason for your high fps.