Would crysis ever be on ps3/xbox?

Rhys said:
Name 5.
Click to expand...

completely destructible environments. Trees break, where you shoot them e.t.c.

Nanosuit abilities, allowing you to cloak, punch vehicles away or destroy shacks with your bare fists, jump high to gain tactical advantages over your enemy e.t.c.

Fully interactive environment. Pick up almost anything to use as a weapon even your enemies.

interactive wildlife, so you can dunk an enemy in the wtaer and wait for a shark to come and eat him

Fully day/night cycle in multiplayer where you take part in long,long games having to use tactics and plan attacks by night, institgate dawn raids e.t.c. ( basically use the weather,time and environment to you advantage

i've probably forgotton stuff too, but these are what i am looking forward too.
 
Jono8 said:
completely destructible environments. Trees break, where you shoot them e.t.c.

Nanosuit abilities, allowing you to cloak, punch vehicles away or destroy shacks with your bare fists, jump high to gain tactical advantages over your enemy e.t.c.

Fully interactive environment. Pick up almost anything to use as a weapon even your enemies.

interactive wildlife, so you can dunk an enemy in the wtaer and wait for a shark to come and eat him

Fully day/night cycle in multiplayer where you take part in long,long games having to use tactics and plan attacks by night, institgate dawn raids e.t.c. ( basically use the weather,time and environment to you advantage

i've probably forgotton stuff too, but these are what i am looking forward too.
Click to expand...

thatll shut him up :p ;)
 
Rhys said:
Why do you want Crysis anyway?

There are loads of FPS out/coming out for the 360. I know it will be an amazing game [edit : graphically] but at the end of the day its just another FPS. If I had spent >£1k on a PC then it justifies the purchase but its not going to be any new ideas , its just prtettier gfx from what Ive seen.
Click to expand...

Graphics aside I reckon Crysis' strongest points will probably be the physics engine coupled with the destructable environments, which in theory could affect gameplay dramatically if Crytek really take advantage of it. Not to mention the sheer amount of customization/editing options. Plus like you said it will be an amazing game - which is good enough reason for most people.
 
Jono8 said:
completely destructible environments. Trees break, where you shoot them e.t.c.

Nanosuit abilities, allowing you to cloak, punch vehicles away or destroy shacks with your bare fists, jump high to gain tactical advantages over your enemy e.t.c.

Fully interactive environment. Pick up almost anything to use as a weapon even your enemies.

interactive wildlife, so you can dunk an enemy in the wtaer and wait for a shark to come and eat him

Fully day/night cycle in multiplayer where you take part in long,long games having to use tactics and plan attacks by night, institgate dawn raids e.t.c. ( basically use the weather,time and environment to you advantage

i've probably forgotton stuff too, but these are what i am looking forward too.
Click to expand...

quite a few games with destrutable envirorments, but i see crysis is probably the most detailed of them all.

nanosuit abilitiys, all of them mentioned you can do in crackdown.

HL2had pretty much a full interactive envirorment, plus dead rising you could pick up anything, but like said before crysis probably does it a lot better.

Even games like oblivion had interactive wildlife, esp with mods.

night cycle thing has been done in a lot of games, like in old ps2 games like conflict desert storm, but once again crysis does it better and in multiplayer.


Seems most of the ideas arnt new, but just improved, which isnt a bad thing i suppose.
 
tomanders91 said:
q
Seems most of the ideas arnt new, but just improved, which isnt a bad thing i suppose.
Click to expand...

I agree. Nothing new and things are always hyped... "throw a man in the sea and a shark will eat him". Are there any robot crabs in this game too? "Shoot a tree and it will fall over" meh... "biosuit abilities" most futuristic games have it.

I think we are going off topic now anyway, the point I was trying to make is that PC games are no longer what console games want to be when they grow up.
 
tomanders91 said:
nanosuit abilitiys, all of them mentioned you can do in crackdown.

HL2had pretty much a full interactive envirorment, plus dead rising you could pick up anything, but like said before crysis probably does it a lot better.
Click to expand...

Crackdown isn't really a Nano Suit though.

Half Life 2 had objects that were on the level you could toy with but you couldn't really manipulate trees or anything.
Rhys said:
PC games are no longer what console games want to be when they grow up.
Click to expand...
Tosh.
 
Jihad said:
Crackdown isn't really a Nano Suit though.

Half Life 2 had objects that were on the level you could toy with but you couldn't really manipulate trees or anything.
.
Click to expand...

Is this a FPS or a Geoff Hamilton sim?

All I think about games these days is how much hype they put into it. Every new game is supposed to be so amazing it will change your life. Its all a gradual curve. The Wii is the only innovation in the gaming world since Doom.
 
Rhys said:
I agree. Nothing new and things are always hyped... "throw a man in the sea and a shark will eat him". Are there any robot crabs in this game too? "Shoot a tree and it will fall over" meh... "biosuit abilities" most futuristic games have it.

I think we are going off topic now anyway, the point I was trying to make is that PC games are no longer what console games want to be when they grow up.
Click to expand...

Shame the consoles are stuck with the same ageing technology for the next 4 years....:o
 
Ok, what FPS would you constitute makes a change, when Crysis, which is remarkably different to all these linear shooters, isn't enough? I'm interested to hear from those who dismiss Crysis as just another FPS.
 
I don't see what the big deal is about the game. It's just another sodding FPS with pretty graphics, I bet it's multiplayer will be utter carp like FarCry's was. FarCry is probably the best FPS I've ever played with HL a close second, but at the end of the day it's just another FPS that gave us just a few new things.

All I repeatedly see is video after video of boring physics, and DX10 visual sparklies. It gets boring so fast that I cba to even look at any gameplay vids, if any.
 
I have no idea if it would be possible but shouldnt the Windows OS footprint be taken into account?

If the Windows code is as legacy as people suggest maybe the newer consoles have a much more efficient, less resource hungry OS running in the background thus leaving more resources for games.

Just a thought anyway.
 
KNiVES said:
Ok, what FPS would you constitute makes a change, when Crysis, which is remarkably different to all these linear shooters, isn't enough? I'm interested to hear from those who dismiss Crysis as just another FPS.
Click to expand...

It is just another fps, just one with pretty graphics ;)
 
Jono8 said:
Shame the consoles are stuck with the same ageing technology for the next 4 years....:o
Click to expand...


Shame a decent graphics card costs as much as a console :rolleyes:

In 4 years or whatever you buy the next console at a fraction of the price of a high end PC.
 
Drukk said:
Shame a decent graphics card costs as much as a console :rolleyes:

In 4 years or whatever you buy the next console at a fraction of the price of a high end PC.
Click to expand...

Shame consoles games are £10-£15 more than pc games and all their peripharals are stupidly overpriced.

Shame i need a decent pc for my Uni work ( Music, need a decent cpu and ram for cubase and high quality sound samples)

So for me pc gaming is far cheaper and better :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom