Bush warns of World War III if Iran goes nuclear

Perhaps its Iran's decision to switch to Euros for oil payments rather than the dieing Dollar?

Did'nt Saddam attempt to do the same thing before Iraqs liberation(laugh) by the US?

Its not Iran's decision though is it ? Its there goverment (well the few people that matter and make the final decision) Im sure most Iranians regardless of culture etc wont wish war upon there country. Some of the comments in this thread leave me to belive you would be as good a leader as BUSH himself! all gunho!!!!!!

Truth be known I dont care tbh, I never have. As Ive said before now all war is down to 1-2 people having a lovers tiff and instead of splitting up for a week and getting back togather they start throwing human live's away!! U GO AMERICA or any other country for that matter.

How many lives have been lost in the middle east at current ? How many were deaths by ally soldiers? How many deaths could have been prevented if we didnt go? If a goverment wants to run its country that way let it ! ppl will sort get fed up and do what they must... Unfortunetly its a case of luck when being born your either in a nice country run by gunho's or in our case ppl who are intrested in turning domes into casino's or your born into a country where your goverment want to shoot you.

Either way this all boils down to goverments and presidents.... I think they should be removed from power and a big group council made with a rep from all countrys to manage the world.
 
I would be more worried about Israel's response than that of the United States.

For a country that is adamant that their nuclear research is for peaceful means they are not half being secretive about it. I have said before that Iran is not a responsible enough nation to have such weaponry. Their talk of the Holocaust being made up and that Israel should be wiped off the map go a little way to suggesting this.
 
<Snip>
Either way this all boils down to goverments and presidents.... I think they should be removed from power and a big group council made with a rep from all countrys to manage the world.

Wars are faught over money and resources.

Iran's current goverment/leaders overthrew the then American installed dictator.
 
Right but again its a goverments argument... not the countrys. I will not support any way period, not unless it was justified. If they were granted these war heads and abuse it then fair play but condoming sp before it happens well its stupid
 
Right but again its a goverments argument... not the countrys. I will not support any way period, not unless it was justified. If they were granted these war heads and abuse it then fair play but condoming sp before it happens well its stupid

I agree,if Iran is indeed attempting to make nukes they would most likely to be used in a defensive/deterrent role against an attack by the US.

I would bet if Iraq would have had nukes the invasion would never have taken place.
 
I find it strange that people bring fairness into a debate about world peace. Who cares what is fair as long as the human race survives in the relative peace we have had for the last 50+ years. Whether it is fair that Iran be allowed to produce nuclear weapons is absolutely beside the point. The less countries who have them the better.
 
So as the President of the United States you would be willing to risk world peace on a gut feeling you have.

Do you actually believe Iran are going to launch a Nuclear attack on anyone?The Iranians know full well a relatitory strike would result in the complete destruction of their country.
 
Do you actually believe Iran are going to launch a Nuclear attack on anyone?The Iranians know full well a relatitory strike would result in the complete destruction of their country.

I believe it's possible and thats enough. It is unfortunate that so many countries possess nuclear arms and there is nothing anyone can do about that now. However if the superpowers can stop other nations acquiring nuclear arms then they should. Not just Iran, any nation, but Iran's sabre rattling in particular is cause for concern. Throw Islam and extremists into the mix and nothing is certain.

Again you are basing your arguments on gut feelings and what people believe. I would prefer to be protected from what can possibly happen as well as just what is certain to happen.
 
Your gut feeling comment.... dont anyone do that? George Bush makes a decision on a gut feeling or one his advisor has so yes. If any1 attacked USA or any ally'd country the bombers would be blown from the face of the earth
 
I believe it's possible and thats enough. It is unfortunate that so many countries possess nuclear arms and there is nothing anyone can do about that now. However if the superpowers can stop other nations acquiring nuclear arms then they should. Not just Iran, any nation, but Iran's sabre rattling in particular is cause for concern. Throw Islam and extremists into the mix and nothing is certain.

Again you are basing your arguments on gut feelings and what people believe. I would prefer to be protected from what can possibly happen as well as just what is certain to happen.

Iran's sabre rattling?All the talk of war comes from Bush and comments Iran makes are in retalition to what the US says.When you talk of religion could they same not be said of the rise of the extreme Christain right in US politics?

During the cold war we did'nt militarly attack Russia,and they were more of a threat than the Iranians will ever be.

Taken from an Iranian point of view,what would you do to prevent the US invading and destroying your country?
 
What people forget is, ok, the conflict would remain predominantly within the 'Middle East' Region, however, we have these lovely people in our own countries called extremists who would do exactly the same as they've been doing but on a much higher unpresidented scale. That, ladies and gentlemen is called suicide bombing!

We all saw the news and how 'Baghdad comes to London'. Thats not even considered a true War, more of a peace keeping effort. I feel if World War III really kicked off, Iran attacked Isreal, then I have no doubt that the US would step in and in turn other 'friendly' nations would become involved. This would inevitably lead to provking the UK Muslim extremists.

Take that as you will . . .
 
I don't understand why the USA or anyone would need to get involved to protect Isreal. Are they not capable of looking after themselves? Don't know how true it is but do Isreal not have one the best equipped and best trained armys in the world? A close friend of mine is ex British Army and it is he who has given me this impression of Isreal. I recall conflabs (mostly when drunk!) where he has told me that Isreal is one tough nation and that their secret services are superior to any, including Britain's and the US.

However, I'm not saying that any of this is fact as it could just be me being gullible?
 
America shouldn't whine, they might lure out a nuke against europe :(.
Invading Irak was a fault anyhow, no weapons of mass destruction found.
 
I don't understand why the USA or anyone would need to get involved to protect Isreal. Are they not capable of looking after themselves? Don't know how true it is but do Isreal not have one the best equipped and best trained armys in the world? A close friend of mine is ex British Army and it is he who has given me this impression of Isreal. I recall conflabs (mostly when drunk!) where he has told me that Isreal is one tough nation and that their secret services are superior to any, including Britain's and the US.

However, I'm not saying that any of this is fact as it could just be me being gullible?


No, you're correct. They do have a great armed forces, they are ruthless and don't stop till they get what they want.

Take a look at their hardware. M-16 Assault Rifles, F-16 Fighters etc etc. all American!!! Don't forget that half of America (probably more) is run by Jews! Why would they NOT step in to protect their Jewish brothers?

The problem with isralis is that they just feel sorry for themselves. The majority of Isralies that I've come into contact with are totally arrogant, selfish and have no regard or thought for anyone else who isn't a Jew.

They are rather heavy handed at controling situations because they'd rather get rid of the problem straight away, sooner rather than later. Fair play to them, they are decisive and get the job done, but some what heavy handed!!!!
 
They have a good military etc, but it's not massive. Britain probably has the best set of armed services in the world, in terms of training and equipment, it doesn't mean we can take on everyone!

I agree with the training but hasn't there been a few headlines recently about how poorly equipped our soldiers have been at times?
 
Do you actually believe Iran are going to launch a Nuclear attack on anyone?........

It is always for consideration that they “make ‘em and sell ‘em” to other interested parties - you know a bit like Tupperware Parties? Invite a few friends around from Al Qaeda, Hamas etc and hit ‘em with your best pitch “Oh come on Osama if you buy just a couple more of those suitcase H-Bombs you’ve always wanted Khaled Mashaal, Ismail Haniya can take home some of those 120mm nuclear shells at half price then we can all go home for a good night's sleep!"

Lala Salama Vienna!
 
Back
Top Bottom