Was Crysis Overhype?
- Thread starter easyrider
- Start date
Clearly your out of your depth (noob tbh). The game uses dual core 100% on both mainly. once GPU's catch up so will the quad at the higher resolutions. What aren't you understanding here.
Hmmmmm
Screenie of what, I just told you that I was running Crysis in the foreground (full-screen) and task manager in the background minimised. That graph is what I came back to when the benchmark finished.
I'm not sure what else there is to screenshot.
Screenie of what, I just told you that I was running Crysis in the foreground (full-screen) and task manager in the background minimised. That graph is what I came back to when the benchmark finished.
I'm not sure what else there is to screenshot.
In Game
Hmmmmm
Yes?
You still aren't getting it...I said most are not utilized properly due to many quad games being GPU limited, or at least that is what I mean/meant. Your looking for an easy way out as you've dug too far.
Agree with the above.
It's just the Crysis CPU benchmark running in 800x600, I have no idea what you could possibly want to see there.
No,
IN game.
I Have 3 Screens.
When I'm Gaming I exactly know what my CPU is up to.
I want a screenie
Show me one
More like you misunderstood what I meant and made yourself look like a fool in the process due to being proved completely wrong thus voiding the thread, see post #2 sums it up nicely.
"The rider win's again!"
I know what mine is up to, it's the Crysis CPU benchmark with the guy shooting rockets at stuff.
What difference is it going to make if you see one frame of a rocket hitting a wall?
Last edited:
I want a screenie of In game.
Not a Benchmark
I want to see task manager in game.
Thats it.
Do it.
Or I will
I want to know what point you're trying to make first. If you're accusing me of something like faking my graph I want to see it in the open ready to disprove myself with said screenshot.
More like you misunderstood what I meant and made yourself look like a fool in the process due to being proved completely wrong thus voiding the thread, see post #2 sums it up nicely.
"The rider win's again!"
lol
You have already been undecided wether a quad or dual is beneficial.
In one instance you say a dual is as good as quad.
in another you say a quad is better than a dual.
Decide now.
I have quoted your nonsenselong enough lol
Which is it?
TBH I think he's doubting the authenticity of my graph and doesn't want to say it out in the open in case it makes him look bad. I want to see such an accusation before I go and prove it wrong.You could have had it done by now
If there's some other reason I'm not getting, I'd just like to know it.
Clearly your out of your depth (noob tbh
Like I said the guys looking for an easy way out.
I think he genuinely believes your faking that graph
, how shallow.