*** The Official G92 8800GTS 512 Overclocking Thread ***

[waso_dude]

Well I just pulled 2Gb of my ram out and clocked back up to 3.15Ghz and gained 1000 points on my score, running the above clocks my score is now 12545, maybe I should push some more.

Thats less then my gt at about the same CPU clock.

 

[Nick1881]

What OS? im running Vista that score was with everything else running too.

 

[The Asgard]

What sort of performance inceases are these cards showing when overclocked while playing crysis? I know benchies give an indication of performance, but real world apps (games) is what I'd be interested in, what sort of percentage increase over their old cards (8800gt I'm guessing here) would be nice to know

Crisis GPU Bench Mark @ 800/2200
Q6600 @ 3903

1920x1200 Everything High apart from post processing which is on medium

Test 0
min 23.72
avg 36.87
max 45.9

Test 1
min 23.72
avg 39.68
max 46.32

Test 2
min 23.72
avg 39.70
max 46.32

Test 3
min 23.72
avg 39.68
max 46.32

 

[willhub]

Crisis GPU Bench Mark @ 800/2200
Q6600 @ 3903

1920x1200 Everything High apart from post processing which is on medium

Test 0
min 23.72
avg 36.87
max 45.9

Test 1
min 23.72
avg 39.68
max 46.32

Test 2
min 23.72
avg 39.70
max 46.32

Test 3
min 23.72
avg 39.68
max 46.32

How much faster is this than an 8800GT on avarage then in crysis?

 

[The Asgard]

From the GT Thread

Post processing was on high though. If I get some time this afternoon I will re-run with post on high.


--------------


Just run Crisis everything high no AA under XP E6600 @ 3.6 - 745/2100/1863


@ 1920x1200

Min 23
Average 28
Max 32

 

[The Asgard]

How much faster is this than an 8800GT on avarage then in crysis?

If you want lets run the test between us. Whats your rez? 1680?

Everything on high with post on medium. You run it and I will. Quad makes zero difference.

 

[Born_2_Kill_83]

Is this card any faster than a 8800gtx/ultra in crysis?

 

[C64]

MAde one so you can compare this is 8800gt @ 751/1804/2002 set on rivatuner [email protected] ghz
1680-1050 everything high post processing on medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 42.61s, Average FPS: 46.94
Min FPS: 32.80 at frame 138, Max FPS: 60.60 at frame 1003

!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 37.74s, Average FPS: 52.99
Min FPS: 32.80 at frame 138, Max FPS: 66.81 at frame 126

!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 37.72s, Average FPS: 53.02
Min FPS: 32.80 at frame 138, Max FPS: 69.26 at frame 89

!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 37.76s, Average FPS: 52.97
Min FPS: 32.80 at frame 138, Max FPS: 69.26 at frame 89

TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)

 

[The Asgard]

Is this card any faster than a 8800gtx/ultra in crysis?

I would say possibly yes. Perhaps someone with a GTX & Ultra would like to run the GPU Bench in Crisis?

Three tests

Everything High with post processing on medium.

1280
1680
1920

 

[eyetrip]

Why do you insist on putting post processing on medium? Why not just run it all high?

 

[The Asgard]

Why do you insist on putting post processing on medium? Why not just run it all high?

Because I have already done a run with it on medium?????
Plus most people run with it on medium.
Also its unplayable with a GT on high

 

[willhub]

Because I have already done a run with it on medium?????
Plus most people run with it on medium.
Also its unplayable with a GT on high

Odd it was playable for me on all high lol at 1680x1050, dont know the fps but it was playable, and no I did not check the ship part of the spaceship.

 

[C64]

Yea what on earth i played through the whole game everything on high on a gt was fine

 

[The Asgard]

Odd it was playable for me on all high lol at 1680x1050, dont know the fps but it was playable, and no I did not check the ship part of the spaceship.

I play at 1920x1200 and while it was fine at the start once the bit around the ship kicked off it became unplayable.

Thats why I benched it at 1920x1200

 

[willhub]

I play at 1920x1200 and while it was fine at the start once the bit around the ship kicked off it became unplayable.

Thats why I benched it at 1920x1200

Hmmm I'm thinking if I can pull something off without making any loss I might get a GTS, looks like your GTS results at the higher res are the same as a GT at 1680x1050.

 

[C64]

Desperate to offload my Gt now lol especially if the s1 fits a gts jesus i payed £197 for my gt for £13 more could have got a gts

 

[Margaret]

Hmmm I'm thinking if I can pull something off without making any loss I might get a GTS, looks like your GTS results at the higher res are the same as a GT at 1680x1050.

Really there is no real point, most people by now have played Crysis a few fps isn't gonna make it much more enjoyable.

Speaking of Crysis I played it all the way through on High with some extra effects and it was fine, even on the ship I was at 20-30FPS at 1680x1050, I had to restart the game though to refresh the memory it seemed.

 

[C64]

I'd rather pay £30 now after selling a gt and get a gts and sell that for £170 come the 9800 than keep the gt and get £90 come the 9800.

 

[willhub]

Really there is no real point, most people by now have played Crysis a few fps isn't gonna make it much more enjoyable.

Speaking of Crysis I played it all the way through on High with some extra effects and it was fine, even on the ship I was at 20-30FPS at 1680x1050, I had to restart the game though to refresh the memory it seemed.

Same it was 20-30fps on the ship for me with super tweaks but the problem is it still gets like 18 fps. But then I look at this thread, the MONSTER overclocks on this beast and the performance it has, then there is the hype, its hard to resist

 

[Margaret]

I'd rather pay £30 now after selling a gt and get a gts and sell that for £170 come the 9800 than keep the gt and get £90 come the 9800.

What idiot is gonna pay nearly £100 more for a 8800GTS G92 over a 8800GT, well good luck.