1st ran was 2xAA and 2nd run is 4xAA.
![]()
by the way, that's with an unoverclocked GTX.
come on GTS owners, give us your AA results

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
1st ran was 2xAA and 2nd run is 4xAA.
![]()
what myth?Is this the myth ?
I agree it is odd. Ive re-run the quality tests and they are very similar to those above.
Its also odd the the GT beats the GTS.
btw, Whats your CPU clocked at for those tests? is it the quad@4GHz or the [email protected]?
How about running a different game, FEAR or COH maybe at 1920x1200 with 16AA/16AF.
As no one has yet to do as was asked, here is an 8800 gts 512 @ stock with a 3ghz quad:
![]()
1680x1050, all high except pp on med, no aa, 169.21 drivers, performance set in controll panel.
That's pretty damned close to the op's gtx mildly clocked actually...
I just hate the fact you get three board changes or is it even tied to one board on oem ?
Very interesting Thread.
Hey C64, If you purchase an OEM copy of Windows Vista and install it on your system and then change your motherboard for a performance upgrade, you will then have to go out and buy a new copy (License) of Windows Vista since you are no longer licensed to use your existing copy of Windows. This is actually nothing to do with Windows Vista, same applies to Windows XP.![]()
Ok ran the benchmark on my GTX system.