not at school maybe but I was phyiscally abused as a child all I had to do was walk in a room.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds as though its a different issue to the one under discussion.
not at school maybe but I was phyiscally abused as a child all I had to do was walk in a room.
Crime and unruliness amongst youth would disappear then if everyone beat their kids and schools were allowed to use the cane etc?![]()
They actually find that 8 pupils is almost too many, a few years ago they only had like 4 or 5 and that was much more manigable and they could teach the kids to get a GCSE (even if it's a really low, bottom grade one).
InvG
not at school maybe but I was phyiscally abused as a child all I had to do was walk in a room.
not at school maybe but I was phyiscally abused as a child all I had to do was walk in a room.
seriously why bother?
it costs what 60k to get those kids an E in something they will forget in a week, when they clearly don't want to be there, send em out to get a job.
[DW]Muffin;10842672 said:It keeps them in line in class, so to not ruin it for the rest of the class (which are after all the important ones). They may learn to 'stfu' and get on with school, they may still be thick, but if they try they will come out with some prospects. Or they'll keep quite.
Also it lets them know there are people out there who don't take their behaviour and will act on it.
They can't get a job can they, under 16 and all. The jobs that most of them do have/have had are drug dealing etc. which doesn't help things now does it?
Lots of the kids actually thank the staff at the school once they leave/have been out in the world as they have been taught enough to actually get by in life, properly and make something of themselves. Unlike in mainstream where they are told they are thick, and just don't bother.
InvG
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that sounds as though its a different issue to the one under discussion.
the so-called "good old days" when "children respected their elders"
hitting a child is wrong below a certain age, i reckon CP in secondary school only really, but the teens are the age when they need to learn there place, if they get too arrogant, then its a spiral down a bad path and the only way out is to PROPERLY teach them a lesson.....not just give them an hour of sitting in a room and thats it
I wouldn't want anyone hitting a child of mine, but there again I would ensure that any kids I have were properly brought up and disciplined. Corporal punishment is a weak yearning for the so-called "good old days" when "children respected their elders", while I suspect the answer to child indiscipline lies elsewhere, mostly with the parents.
Also, while my claims that any child of mine would be properly brought up suggest that it would avoid any punishment throughout school, that doesn't legislate for the sadistic teacher. Everyone has met several of these during their school days. Those who relish the power to mete out punishment. I was once given 4 sides of thin-lined A4 lines to do for forgetting my ruler on a day where it wasn't even needed. This is the sort of teacher who would belt even the best of pupils for a minor indiscretion, and the sort of teacher I would likewise belt for doing it to my kid.
if they get a bottom grade in a gcse they haven't really learnt that much, get them declared an adult an let them get on with it.
Corporal punishment is a weak yearning for the so-called "good old days" when "children respected their elders", while I suspect the answer to child indiscipline lies elsewhere, mostly with the parents.