RBR looks ok, but nothing outstanding (yet anyway).
Trust me, you haven't seen anything yet!
RBR looks ok, but nothing outstanding (yet anyway).
Nope.
DC's car will break down in testing when it can be fixed 100s of times if need be with little or no penalty. Mark Webber, however, will break down in the race, when it counts most. If he is ever found leading a race by a big margin, that is when he is most likely to break down. His luck will dictate this.
So you see, my theory still holds true.![]()
The system will feature a total of 1600 lighting projectors attached to aluminium trusses, which will be suspended 10 metres above the track on vertical steel pylons which will be mounted on prefabricated concrete blocks, placed behind the barriers at intervals of 32m. This will involve a total of 240 steel pylons and a mind boggling 108,423m of cables.
The system will be powered by 12 twin-power generators, each located in a sound-proof container. Should one of the generators fail, the other generators will provide a back-up power by default. Each generator will also have its own engineer on standby whenever they are in operation. The resulting light will be four times brighter than the lighting in a normal sports arena.
Why can't we have a proper night race. with special nose cones just for that race which has to incorporate a standardised lighting system.
Crash Test regs
the fia can create a standard light package that can be incorporated into special aerodynamic parts for that race. I don't see how it would be dangrouse.Then the can of worms would be open as to what is safe and what isn't. Also the amount of light a single "light" would throw out would be minimal,lights outside the chassis of the car would destroy aerodynamics and again be a safety hazard.
The FIA can do whatever they want lol.Do you have any idea how much work would be needed to setup a chassis with a aero package to suit added lights?
