Well got them hooked up and so far, superb![]()
Jokester, I have said it before and I'll say it again: You have an obsessive compulsive disorder for silent PC computing. You really need to seek medical attention!
Yep - They're the dogs, but you need plenty of them. I was running 10 to cool a Prescott 560 (at 4.2GHz - possibly the hottest CPU ever until Wolfdale) with 4 more to cool the Graphics (7800GTX) and two more to cool the chipset.
On my findings I can categorically state tha Wolfdale is NOT a hot CPU.
Jokester, I have said it before and I'll say it again: You have an obsessive compulsive disorder for silent PC computing.
You need all the pump pressure you can get. I'm told once it gets going, any pump could keep it ticking over, but you need lots of oomph to start it moving.
The three Penryn based chips I've used were extremely cool running, as far as I'm aware the latest Coretemp is thought to read the chips at least 10C higher than they really are on the Wolfdales. You can tell they pump out little heat because the difference between idle and load temps is next to nothing.Then your findings are different to mine. My E8400 runs very hot indeed. 44C at idle on stock with a decent water cooling system, properly fitted. My Q6600 B3 never idled that hot at stock, not did it get so hot under load, and the increasing of the TJunction temperature to 105C would indicate to me that Intel expect them to safely run hotter than other CPUs.
I don't know if your CPUs are retail of ES, but you obviously have access to Intel ES parts, so maybe that's where the discrepacy arises?
I don't know if your CPUs are retail of ES, but you obviously have access to Intel ES parts, so maybe that's where the discrepacy arises?
The E8500 is an ES. The E8200 is retail. The reported temperatures are wrong, totally out. Maybe that is what you were going by?
Sorry, my previous post sounded a bit rude on reading it again.![]()