I think the worst culprits are the night dog walkers ,if no one is around they leave it !
Gets me mad aswell, I pick up Our dogs mess. Don't see what makes other people special

I think the worst culprits are the night dog walkers ,if no one is around they leave it !
I own a staff bull, would never attack anybody. However when im under threat by chav's when walking him he quite rightly growls and shows his teeth, if they choose to continue he would proberly bite. I think its unfair that dog's protecting owners get destroyed. (slightly off topic )
Its rediculas and I for one am glad we have a goverment that dont listen to its people.
Yup. It isn't also necessarily that there's going to be an increased probability of attack (etc) but just that if it did occur, the results of a powerfully built dog attacking a person would be far more severe than if a different breed attacked. You have to remember that many of these breeds have been bred to fight and defend - they are inherently unsafe.I won't sign up. There are dangerous dog breeds and that can't be taken away. It simply cannot, it is inherent in their make-up.
Upbringing and breeding has a massive impact on a dog's behavior, but to say that the breed doesn't affect it is nothing short of madness.
With dog bites recently in the news it is clear that current dangerous dogs laws require tightening up. However we petition the government to recognise that it is not the breed of a dog that causes it to attack but rather its upbringing and training. We therefore request that all proposals for any legislation further restricting ownership of any specific breed be rejected and laws focussed instead on the responsible ownership of dogs regardless of breed.
They are trying to show and rightly so in most situations that the reason a dog attacks is because the owner/handler of the animal is unfit to control said animal. The owner has not trained the animal in a way that would help prevent such attacks. And the owner dose not have the skills to train or control the animal. I think the reason for the petition is simple don't outlaw anymore breeds of dog but instead place more responsability on the owners to train and control the dog.
Environmental health have patrols out in plain clothes, watching for people not cleaning up after their dogs, they can get fined upto £1,000.
So the vast majority suffer because of a tiny minority of idiots, who in all reality would just get the next 'ardest looking dog after rotties, staffies, akitas, bullmastiffs were banned.
I would, however, sign a petition to make it the law that ALL dogs should be on a lead and muzzled whenever in public.
If its on the grass, its ok. If its on the path, get a bag.
The problem with dog poo's is people overfeed there animals and give them too much rubbish, then the dogs body has to remove the toxins and it ends up in either a huge crap or a really sloppy one. Feed your dog right on the right food and it shouldn't be bigger then your hand.
Staffies should be banned. Rotts im not sure about, Akitas no and bull mastiffs no.
Thats is a complete over reaction. Not all dogs need to be muzzled and on a lead. You promote aggression in dogs through the frustration of being unable to play. That is why you should always let a dog off the lead when you introduce them.
Heres some google stats (ok its not accurate but you get the picture)
Labrador mauling - 44500 results
Bull terrier mauling - 64800 results
Now bare in mind that the term Bull Terrier can mean more than one sort of bull dog.
The fact is the papers love to slander bull dog type dogs and make them big story's. It sells more papers than "Labrador mauls 10 year old girl."
Any dog has the capability to be dangerous, the breed makes little impact on there danger!
No No NO!!
Please stop sprouting this bloody rubbish all the time!! If it's in a public place, clean it up! Are you saying you'd allow your dog to take a dump on the playing fields and because it's on grass you wouldn't pick it up? Dirty *******!!!!
Sloppy dog poo can be attributed to a whole host of things not just diet!
We went through this weeks ago, have you STILL not read up the facts?
No you should NOT let a dog off a lead when you introduce them, remember the saying "Control your dog". You have NO control over a dog that is loose. What you should be doing is introducing dogs on neutral territory but ON the lead.
Hell no. My dog was attacked 2 weeks ago by a staffy.
I'm guessing you never took your dog or training. The best method and its proven (if i can be arsed to provide the links) is to let both dogs off the lead and sniff. Controlled lead introductions end up in the dog becoming scared as it cant "flee" if he doesn't like the other dog etc. This then turns into frustration and then into a possible snarl/aggressive action.
With the dogs of the lead they can both run away and both have the freedom to sniff and play.
The Rottweiler for instance is actually a herding dog, its only man that turned him into a guard dog.
I find myself agreeing with this. Dogs are wild animals, sure in general they are companions of men and leave us be. However there are some breeds that are by nature, inherently more dangerous than others. Basic animal instinct cannot be removed. Training does help I agree, and does help alleviate a huge proportion of the problem, but it can't rule it out. It's a huge responsibility owning a dangerous dog something that people do all too easily.
I won't be signing.
Hell no. My dog was attacked 2 weeks ago by a staffy.
So because of this you're not prepared to further educated?
While the off-lead exercise is well known, what would happen if 2 dogs didn't get on and ended up in a fight. Worse still if one ran away while the other chased. Even worse, what if one dog continued to run onto a road. Or even worse, got so scared it ran towards a group of people.
My five month old Akita has had off lead labradors run up behind startle him and then snap at him. This has happened twice by one dog and once by another, as I'm sure you can imagine I wasn't too happy. Should I just take the opinion that labs are nasty and aggresive by the actions of two poorly controlled dogs?
Of course not, that would be incredibly small minded of me, and while I'm sorry to hear about your dog getting attacked I think you're displaying the same small mindedness.
@Teki.
You are right to a point mate. With most dogs i completly agree but if i did this with my Frank who is a Big Uber fit lad he could kill someones pet within 1 minute, This would tear me apart inside & something i am not prepared to risk. You really do have to see Frank to see just how fit & strong he actually is. Owners of dangerous dogs such as mine have to treat them different to other breeds of dogs.
Cats rule, dogs drool.
I'm gonna create a petition to ban dogs. They stink anyway.
The example of the Akita situation is a genetic problem with labradors, they just want to play!
It doesn't matter if im being narrow minded, I'd rather have a dog, then not have a dog at all.