[huzeeee];11156706 said:Ohh dont get me wrong, they are both brilliant engines, however the turbo has a higher power potential per £ than the vr6, it is also lighter.
How much lighter though?
Everyone keeps saying its lighter, but by how much?
[huzeeee];11156706 said:Ohh dont get me wrong, they are both brilliant engines, however the turbo has a higher power potential per £ than the vr6, it is also lighter.
Not quite right...[huzeeee];11156706 said:Ohh dont get me wrong, they are both brilliant engines, however the turbo has a higher power potential per £ than the vr6
Marginally. It's also more complicated, more fragile, more temperamental...The VR6 is virtually a 'fit and forget' solution.it is also lighter.
Not quite right...
Depends entirely on the budget and application. If you have a grand to throw at it, you'll get bigger gains from the 1.8t than the VR6. If you have five grand, the VR6 wins hands down.
*n
[huzeeee];11156881 said:This being my point, he will never really want any more than 300 brake. It is far cheaper to get to 300 brake using a 1.8t than it is to use a VR6.
Including the extra initial cost of the engine and conversion parts...?
*n
Simon...
http://www.europeancarweb.com/tech/techletters/0000ec_volkswagen_questions/index.html suggests around 80lbs or around 35Kg in real money.
As I said previously, relocate the battery to the rear (20Kg?) and you're almost sorted.
I don't think that weight is an issue here. Certainly those with VR6-powered mk2s don't say the weight effects the handling.
By all accounts, the same engine in a mk1 is a nightmare though...
*n
[huzeeee];11156916 said:It is a fair point, but 2k for a blower is quite a lot......
Sounds cheap to me. I have to pay £3.5k for one.
And you still only get 10lb/ft after fitting one too
*n
Whats insurance like on an engine change at 19?
[huzeeee];11156916 said:It is a fair point, but 2k for a blower is quite a lot......