Are you deranged?
Just thought of the best Roulette winner!
- Thread starter salami1212
- Start date
- Status
Are you deranged?
Just explain what you're doing slowly...
WTF does each row in this table mean? You said it's bet, winnings, net profit, but if that's the case, how can the numbers in rows 1 and 2 be different? What the hell does this table mean? Explain that and then maybe we can get somewhere with this...
1 3 2
1 3 1
4 12 6
9 15 6
11 33 7
15 45 10
25 75 15
40 120 14
80 240 54
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 655
- Location
- Leeds / Newcastle Uni
you sir have excelled yourself in idiocy.
please for the sake of your savings never go near a casino.
please for the sake of your savings never go near a casino.
So you bet on 1-12, so there is a slightly greater than 2/3 chance each time that you will lose. That means for every time you win, you will lose more than twice.
In what way does that represent a winning strategy?
Whats the point, he has clearly shown the ability to grasp ziltch.
It sounds a lot like he's already applying this system, and unfortunately for him it sounds like he's had some success with it.
I say unfortunately because that means he'll gamble more on it.
Its an adaptation of the Martingale strategy, basically to get to the last line you would have to lose 8 times in a row and the winnings are every loss before subtracted from your "winnings" for that bet.
What it misses out is that it is statistically probable you will either run out of money or hit the table limit chasing your losses.
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 3,027
lmao you people make me laugh seriouslyy
von helmet, i only just read your statistics stuff.. pretty confusing to be honest..
my system is good if you have £200.. if you dont get the ball landing in the lowest 12 numbers (think its 12?) at least once in that 9 times, then thats unlucky.. seriously, unlucky, its highly likely that you will win though
von helmet, i only just read your statistics stuff.. pretty confusing to be honest..
my system is good if you have £200.. if you dont get the ball landing in the lowest 12 numbers (think its 12?) at least once in that 9 times, then thats unlucky.. seriously, unlucky, its highly likely that you will win though
Nope, sorry.
Agreed. There is no magic "gambling system" that will let you win. You can skew the odds so that you have a high chance of winning a small amount of money against a relatively low chance of losing a lot, or vica versa, and of course lots of places in between, but however you bet the casino will make money on average. If you believe intuition rather than the maths (which you must, otherwise you wouldn't be betting!) then you will lose out in the long run (or even in the short run if you're unlucky)
It's not as unlucky as it needs to be. On average you will lose. It sounds like you have a system that will let you win a small amount maybe 95% of the time, but lose masses the other 5%. You might even be able to push the odds further than that - the problem is that eventually (but it might even be the first time) you will lose big, and on average you will always lose. Please, for your own sake, work it out properly and stop now. If you don't then I am aboslutely certain that you will one day regret it.
Last edited:
Ha!
You've got a cheak. He makes perfect sense.
You have the IQ of pond scum by the looks of it, no offence. But its time you realised.
Associate
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 655
- Location
- Leeds / Newcastle Uni
i don't wish to be mean but i really do hope you lose your £200 one day, as it seems that would be the only way for you to accept you're wrong.
Tell you what salami, save up for a couple of years and I'll do the same.
We go to Vegas.
Take half of your money and use it for your system, wager the other half against mine, I'll give you 2:1.
I'm backing the house to win.
We go to Vegas.
Take half of your money and use it for your system, wager the other half against mine, I'll give you 2:1.
I'm backing the house to win.
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 3,027
its more probable you will win, you wait for people to lose all their money, and then pounce on that machine, basically a guaranteed win, be it £10 profit, or £50, £10 profit would be fine for me
.
You have the IQ of pond scum by the looks of it, no offence. But its time you realised.
I object.
I've seen some intelligent looking pond-life in my time.. some algae once told me a blackjack system...
I think that about says all we need to know... If you think you've come up with a winning strategy on a game of chance, but you can't understand that kind of basic probability, I'd say you're odds on for a hiding.
(See what I did there? HAR HAR!)
salami1212 said:
No, it's not. Besides, even if you do win, with Martingale you only win the winnings of your first bet because everything after that goes towards covering your losses.
- Status