Paul Mcartney / Heather Mills

[SexyGreyFox]

Your posts are so very confusing. One minute you're hating McCartney, then you're supporting her, then your saying it's unfair that this sort of thing happens.

Sort out the consistency of your posts - they're becoming worthy of ignoring.

You're reading somebody else then because my stance has been the same from the very start.

I empathise with her and everything that has happened to her and I think she should get half of what is his and he should have half of hers - thats how courts up and down the land usually do business.
In fact, the woman usually gets more.
He chased her, he hit it, he got her pregnant, he didn't like her charity work, he got fed up so he should pay the piper.
Its no different to what would happen to you or me but somehow he's got away with it.
There is no inconsistency with my posts, I like her, I dislike him.
I think she has a very poor way of putting her problems over and thats why most people dislike her.

HOWEVER, and this isn't an inconsistency :
I have many many friends who have been taken to the cleaners in courts by ex wives and I hope that the courts now use McArtneys Law to divide property up.

If you can show me an inconsistency then I'll put my hands up.

 

[m4cc45]

Just reading the comments on BBC news from the money grabbing so and so makes me so frustrated with the laws in this country.

I don't know what exactly has gone on nor will anyone for a damn good while but it seems that she was out for what she could get.

Referring to the 35k that her kid was getting saying that she would have to travel second class had to be a joke, and a very bad one. She has 25 million quid in her pocket and doesn't want to pay for the kid? God almighty she annoys me.



M.

 

[cheets64]

Shocking, she was making a living off charity work, she now has £25 million to live off and she wants to bring it to the publics attention even more, few months back she was livid with the press and the media for printing stuff about her now she is playing into there hands.

Pathetic

 

[platypus]

I empathise with her and everything that has happened to her and I think she should get half of what is his and he should have half of hers - thats how courts up and down the land usually do business.
In fact, the woman usually gets more.

What an idiotic thing to say, especially given the fact that you mention you've had friends who've been taken to the cleaners, you'd think you'd have some empathy. You certainly pretend too. Your posts are so hypocritical it's irritating. You appear to have a pathalogical hate for the guy (maybe because he's made a success of music?), you like her (god knows why), we get it. Just stop pretending she deserves any of it.

Shocking, she was making a living off charity work, she now has £25 million to live off and she wants to bring it to the publics attention even more, few months back she was livid with the press and the media for printing stuff about her now she is playing into there hands.

Pathetic

This is the problem with celebrities sadly. They need the media to gain fame, without it they'd be nothing.

 

[Surfer]

she should be given half of everything he has if she can prove how many beatles songs she wrote.

ohh wait she didnt write any... shes a prosti...sorry pron star who hung around him shagging him every so often....its pretty clear shes the queen gold-digger...

not a great advertisement for womankind everywhere ehh

apparently it factors down to £250k a week doing bog all...

yeh right...liar liar peg leg on fire Heather...

hahaha

 

[JonnyT]

I don't think I'll get married again. I'll just find a woman I don't like and give her a house.

Ah, yes, divorce... from the Latin word meaning to rip out a man's genitals through his wallet.

I'm with them tbh.

 

[HEADRAT]

She's been refused leave to appeal about having the details of the settlement released (Just on News 24.)

 

[Muffin`]

She's been refused leave to appeal about having the details of the settlement released (Just on News 24.)

She's been refused the right to leave the details out on appeal does that mean?

 

[MarcLister]

I think it means that she hasn't been given leave to appeal the settlement.

 

[Deluxe1]

Poor Heather,14 million in the bank,10k a week in interest,however will she survive on that.

 

[MarcLister]

Poor Heather,14 million in the bank,10k a week in interest,however will she survive on that.

Well strictly speaking £24m. Although some of it has been earmarked for a house in London (£2.5m) I think.

 

[Biohazard]

I wonder if those of you whom so vehemently despise the woman actually KNOW why you harbour such a hatred for her? Because The Sun said she was an evil, conniving, gold digger?

rofl. Honestly, go away. seriously now.

I never pick up the Sun, my opinion came from her fast track week of walking into every TV station in the country and demanding that 'her side' be aired, which was nothing more than a rant. The judge at one point warned her that if there were anymore rants/revelations he would dismiss the case. All she has done is tried to launch a smear campaign against an old man for her gain.

Yesterdays 'rant' outside the court for example, when the judge had "already decided as he came in with the statement" 'apparently' without hearing her side even though she was there to receive JUDGEMENT, and that all crap about the lawyers along with the system were 'against' her. She came out that court room confused and bewildered, because she is a moronic hop-a-long freight train that never knows when to shut up.

Kudos to Sir Paul for putting up with such a vehemently repulsive and forked tongue.

Such a good tactical move, sacking your legal team after one day.

 

[>:|sh4d0w|:<]

Well come on, I'm sure 99% of people in her position would try for as much as possible.

Well that as may be, it shouldnt have any bearing on whether we feel the judgement is fair/correct or not.

 

[SexyGreyFox]

What an idiotic thing to say, especially given the fact that you mention you've had friends who've been taken to the cleaners, you'd think you'd have some empathy. You certainly pretend too. Your posts are so hypocritical it's irritating.

I am not being hypocritical.
If my mates have been taken to the cleaners by ex wives then why can't Sir Paul?
In fact I'm being exactly the opposite of hypocritical.
Hopefully this will now become McArtneys Law and every hard done man in the land will now have a case.

Please read what I post.

You appear to have a pathalogical hate for the guy (maybe because he's made a success of music?),

I have every album he's made and I'm looking at two DVDs in front of me.
I did mention my respect for his music earlier.
Please read what I post.

rofl. Honestly, go away. seriously now.

Not my words.
Please read what I post.

 

[MarcLister]

Heather Mills' evidence in her divorce case with Sir Paul McCartney was "inconsistent, inaccurate" and "less than candid", according to the judge.

Sir Paul's evidence was described as "balanced".

"He expressed himself moderately though at times with justifiable irritation, if not anger. He was consistent, accurate and honest," Mr Justice Bennett said.

But he added: "I am driven to the conclusion that much of her evidence, both written and oral, was not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid".

"Overall she was a less than impressive witness," he said.

all from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7302736.stm

 

[gjc10212]

An allowance of £25000 per year for a nanny - can't be bad.

£35k till your daughter is 17 - sniff sniff. B class travel slumming it in First class instead of 'upper'.

Stupid wench, did she honestly expect to get 100m+. Hope she rots tbh. Wood worms work on it now!

 

[bitboy]

The judge added that her tax returns "disclose no charitable giving at all", despite Mills saying she gave "as much as 80% or 90% of her earnings ... direct to charities".

 

[MarcLister]

Haha I missed that bit.

 

[Fourstar]

Originally Posted by BBC News
The judge added that her tax returns "disclose no charitable giving at all", despite Mills saying she gave "as much as 80% or 90% of her earnings ... direct to charities".

I wonder if the media pursues her over this. It could get very ugly.

She is directly quoted on GMTV saying:

Think of one thing I've done since you've known me, since I came on here 14 years ago [she was talking about vegetarianism], one thing that hasn't been done for charity. 80% of my money goes to charity and thats why people want to have a go at me.

I bet she meant 80% of her charity's money is used for charitable purposes and she only draws 20% remuneration


I don't particularly care about the divorce or how much she got, Paul would have been aware of the financial implications when they tied the knot. Anyway around 6% of his assets isn't all that much.

What really annoys me is having to hear about her unashamed self publicising, winging, crying and abuse of anything or anyone not supportive of her.

I hope she takes her money and goes away to build a life for her and her daughter out of the media spotlight so I never have to hear about her again.

 

[Von Luck]

..