£50,000 to spend

[thepharcyde]

this is a 106

 

[DreXeL]

Oh yeah, hows this legal MOT wise?

No washers or door handles either, looking through the thread he says he 'has a very friendly MOT tester'....

Must be great when it starts raining

To be fair it does all look like it's been done to a high standard, the interior is pretty impressive in that respect (that steering 'wheel' is just bizzare though :/ )

But Christ, £50k :/

 

[jackoh]

this is a 106

No it isn't

 

[Muffin`]

this is a 106

http://www.pistonheads.com/aimg/424489-1.jpg

Raise you:

 

[Redrum]

That interior is really nice apart from the stupid steering wheel, especially for a Peugeot. The external mods are ghastly though.

Oh yeah, hows this legal MOT wise?

He says in the thread that he has a friendly mot guy that gives him an mot even though its lacking wipers, door handles and side repeaters. Kind of defeats the point of mots if you can just get a dodgy tester to give you one anyway. Still, makes a change from the ones that are the other way round and make stuff up.

 

[SoliD]

To be fair it does all look like it's been done to a high standard, the interior is pretty impressive in that respect (that steering 'wheel' is just bizzare though :/ )

Agreed with this, that interior looks very professionally done but for 10k it should be. Definitely hideous but does look as tho the workmanship has gone into it.

 

[Hen_Dawg]

Where did you get the £50,000 figure from?

That said I personally wouldn't pay £50 for that

 

[moss]

Where did you get the £50,000 figure from?

That said I personally wouldn't pay £50 for that

Hes spent £50k on buying the car and turning it into what it is now.

 

[.:MBK:.]

very well done (interior anyway, rest of the car makes me want to vomit), buts its still not road legal and its still a pug 106

 

[DannyW]

what the **** is he gonna do if it starts raining heavy, what a plum

Fully star out any swearing

 

[Hilly]

No front plate, illegal,
No front windscreen wiper, illegal,
No back windscreen wiper, illegal,
No tax disc or tax disc holder, e.t.c

 

[[TW]Fox]

No back windscreen wiper, illegal

Really? That makes my car illegal then..

 

[DannyW]

having no rear wiper is not illeagal

EDIT: Damn you fox

 

[Ben M]

Really? That makes my car illegal then..

You're such a rebel Fox, I want you so bad about now. Do something else naughty!

 

[excaliborg]

I think it looks alright apart from the lights on the rear window. The guy seems like a sound chap from his posts too and obviously enjoys modifying his car.

 

[Redrum]

what the **** is he gonna do if it starts raining heavy, what a plum

I would imagine he probably uses RainX.

 

[scousegit]

I would imagine he probably uses RainX.

lol Rain X , it doesn't last forever and its not going to substitute wipers

 

[Clarkey]

don't care how much RainX he has, there's no way you are going to be able to see jack **** in that thing on any wet road above 40mph or so. That heap of junk is a danger to society, I hope his MOT tester gets shut down and that car gets crushed tbh :/

 

[Mark A]

Maybe he just took them off for the photo as i cant see how you can drive in rain without them.

Looks like theres a bit of paint chipped off on the grill, unless its just the picture.

 

[peterattheboro]

Not read that thread but i'm gonna guess he keeps it in the garage when it's raining. He certainly can't drive it or leave it outside as his engine would be flooded due to the stupid vents in the bonnet.