Yeah CF1s.
I don't generally drive like a tit around bends or in the wet so they are definatley fine for me![]()
Try swerving in the wet to avoid an accident, and tell me that poor wet weather tyres are "fine" for you

Yeah CF1s.
I don't generally drive like a tit around bends or in the wet so they are definatley fine for me![]()
Try swerving in the wet to avoid an accident, and tell me that poor wet weather tyres are "fine" for you![]()
Try swerving in the wet to avoid an accident, and tell me that poor wet weather tyres are "fine" for you![]()
True.
Although if you leave good stopping distances etc which I normally do, you wont have to encounter such circumstances.
You can't plan for everything. Other people make mistakes.True.
Although if you leave good stopping distances etc which I normally do, you wont have to encounter such circumstances.
Picture the scene.....
You're driving along a 40mph "A" road at 40mph.
The road is wet because it is raining.
A car pulls out from a side road 10 metres ahead of you directly into your path....
What do you do?
a. Brake
b. Swerve
c. Shout "Arrrrrrgh!!!!"
d. All of the above
![]()
That's the case with any car/tyre.
But the car/tyre can be the difference between you smashing into himor not smashing into him
![]()
So why aren't you driving, say, a Porsche 993 which is one of the fastest stopping cars you can buy?
[TW]Fox;11475447 said:Becuase the standard 330mm front brakes on my car are sufficient.
How do you decide what is sufficient and what isn't?
Why are Goodyear Eagle sufficient but perhaps Kumho Ecsta not? Where's the line? Is there a defined cut off between a good and bad tyre? Who decided where that line was?
How do you decide what is sufficient and what isn't?
Why are Goodyear Eagle sufficient but perhaps Kumho Ecsta not?