Conspiracy theories...




Tell me how many are from the same site/domain :)

or as google says on page 90


In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 895 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.


From your link...

Still even with 6 mill illumnati fail hard to porn.
 
Last edited:
Isnt that the symbol thats on American bank notes, Starbucks etc?

Yes :-

illuminati.gif
 
For not believing that their are hundreds of thousands of people trying to control the world outside of generally known circles such as Un, governments etc etc?

Where did i say how many there were, i just see the signs and there certainly is plenty of questionable stuff going on in the world to make one wonder, also im sure the majority of people in governments etc are decent people but that doesn't mean such people can't exist and act in secrecy like organised crime.

The government is branched out all over and no area can totally know whats going on in another but things can and do get done and most goes by generally unnoticed, then theres the oddly obvious signs that seem like they don't care anymore because they know most people consider anything with the word conspiracy in it as crazy bs, strange how the word conspiracy and theory provoke such a reaction without looking eh?

Yes most is bs but that’s obvious with something like this, however there are threads of truth in many storeys and this is probably the oldest there is, men trying to gain power, history shows its happened plenty of times and probably will again, why some think people can't conspire or that it can't happen I don't know, we see enough known groups getting up to **** so why is this such a big deal to accept the possibility of?
 
Where did i say how many there were,

Try and rule the world with less than a million people and you'll fail hard (hell try and rule the world without a billion people and your probably going to fail)


Of course men/women will try to gain power but the whole concept of one group ruling multiple countries is foiled by that very fact, none of them would give up rule of their country for a minor role in a world organization.

As after all it's better to rule in hell than server in heaven.
 
none of them would give up rule of their country for a minor role in a world organization.

EU (Lisbon treaty), North American Union, African Union?

And you assume that most governments are really ruling the planet when the truth is the planets being rules through the central banks.

"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1790
 
Try and rule the world with less than a million people and you'll fail hard (hell try and rule the world without a billion people and your probably going to fail)


Of course men/women will try to gain power but the whole concept of one group ruling multiple countries is foiled by that very fact, none of them would give up rule of their country for a minor role in a world organization.

As after all it's better to rule in hell than server in heaven.

Who knows how they plan to do it, no you can't fully control a population that knows it but don't for a second believe it can't happen in underhanded ways, i mean have you seen the trends in the news of where things in the western world seem to be going?

Such obviously wrong and questionable things are going on and have done for years but its gotten worse and more obvious recently.
 
Who knows how they plan to do it, no you can't fully control a population that knows it but don't for a second believe it can't happen in underhanded ways, i mean have you seen the trends in the news of where things in the western world seem to be going?

Such obviously wrong and questionable things are going on and have done for years but its gotten worse and more obvious recently.

the media alone would be several million people.

two things rule out a mass conspiracy the generally self centeredness and evil of man, and the odd good natured and truly decent person.


laws of probability dictate with such an organization your going to meet several hundred of each, and so secrecy is unlikely to be maintained.
 
laws of probability dictate with such an organization your going to meet several hundred of each, and so secrecy is unlikely to be maintained.

Tefal you'r like an osterich with it's head in the sand.

You won't hear about the illuminati in the mainstream media period because directly and indirectly the media are owned by the illuminati. Secondly the mainstream media only employ people with certain political bias and outlook on life, people such as yourself being one example.

Thirdly if a journalist for the BBC did decide to write a story about NWO or Illuminati the editor wouldn't air it as such disclosure could well lead to riots and mass revolts, and also the journalist would probably be fired.

Lastly, there secrecy has been comprimised for many decades though it's only through the internet that it's started to become known by a wider group.
 
the media alone would be several million people.

two things rule out a mass conspiracy the generally self centeredness and evil of man, and the odd good natured and truly decent person.


laws of probability dictate with such an organization your going to meet several hundred of each, and so secrecy is unlikely to be maintained.

I suppose it depends on what you find an acceptable level of control, is it too much to have outright dictators, is it too much to have secret societies, is it too much to have governments watching your every move, is it too much to see signs of a shadowy group behind it all, hmm?

What most think of by control is not the sort of control that really matters, empires and dictators almost always fall but plenty of control can be had without such obvious in your face means and they would still get their way, sucking the wealth of the people while keeping watch on them and guiding earths future in almost total secrecy while getting away with crimes against humanity? Could it happen, is it happening, looking at the world I have to wonder...
 
Good grief, you guys are nuts.

There is no world encompassing conspiracy theory. Just a bunch of crappy governments bickering.
 
is it too much to have governments watching your every move

yes due to the fact, of once again numbers + the huge and incredible amount of material evidence/data such a task would provide.

for example to watch 100 people all the time you would need something like 50 + people (which is why most high street ect cameras are only actively monitored at certain time the rest is only checked if there is a report.) to watch say the 60 million people i Britain you would need something like 30 million people to watch the screens for America 150 million, china 50million India ~ 500 million.

At the moment we can;t even keep a police station of 100 people quiet, let alone 1 billion + people+ huge amounts of easily copyable data.
 
Tefal you'r like an osterich with it's head in the sand.

You won't hear about the illuminati in the mainstream media period because directly and indirectly the media are owned by the illuminati. Secondly the mainstream media only employ people with certain political bias and outlook on life, people such as yourself being one example.

Thirdly if a journalist for the BBC did decide to write a story about NWO or Illuminati the editor wouldn't air it as such disclosure could well lead to riots and mass revolts, and also the journalist would probably be fired.

Lastly, there secrecy has been comprimised for many decades though it's only through the internet that it's started to become known by a wider group.

While theres no direct conspiracy in most organisations things are controlled in a round about way by the system, your partly right but its not like theres someone standing watch and saying what can and can't pass, people generally follow and don't like to step out of line but thats human nature.

Good grief, you guys are nuts.

There is no world encompassing conspiracy theory. Just a bunch of crappy governments bickering.

No there isn't and yes your partly right, however there is evidence groups want control and at the very least highly suspicious stuff going on in that direction, its the obvious long term goal but the world is an unpredictable place and real control isn't easy but they appear to be trying.

yes due to the fact, of once again numbers + the huge and incredible amount of material evidence/data such a task would provide.

for example to watch 100 people all the time you would need something like 50 + people (which is why most high street ect cameras are only actively monitored at certain time the rest is only checked if there is a report.) to watch say the 60 million people i Britain you would need something like 30 million people to watch the screens for America 150 million, china 50million India ~ 500 million.

At the moment we can;t even keep a police station of 100 people quiet, let alone 1 billion + people+ huge amounts of easily copyable data.

Your missing the point, being watched is enough to keep most people in line, you know how people can already respond to authority, we don't need to be actively monitored, most don't do anything out of the ordinary anyway, yet you can be sure the government can pass any laws it likes while sapping the wealth, where does it all lead to, kind of like a pyramid.
 
Back
Top Bottom