rubbish. I just got 6,220,000 for illuminati
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=illuminati&btnG=Google+Search&meta=&aq=f
tell me how many hits you see?
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 895 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Isnt that the symbol thats on American bank notes, Starbucks etc?
Isnt that the symbol thats on American bank notes, Starbucks etc?
There grip has been exposed by the internet.
For not believing that their are hundreds of thousands of people trying to control the world outside of generally known circles such as Un, governments etc etc?
Where did i say how many there were,
none of them would give up rule of their country for a minor role in a world organization.
"Let me issue
EU (Lisbon treaty), North American Union, African Union?
Try and rule the world with less than a million people and you'll fail hard (hell try and rule the world without a billion people and your probably going to fail)
Of course men/women will try to gain power but the whole concept of one group ruling multiple countries is foiled by that very fact, none of them would give up rule of their country for a minor role in a world organization.
As after all it's better to rule in hell than server in heaven.
Who knows how they plan to do it, no you can't fully control a population that knows it but don't for a second believe it can't happen in underhanded ways, i mean have you seen the trends in the news of where things in the western world seem to be going?
Such obviously wrong and questionable things are going on and have done for years but its gotten worse and more obvious recently.
laws of probability dictate with such an organization your going to meet several hundred of each, and so secrecy is unlikely to be maintained.
the media alone would be several million people.
two things rule out a mass conspiracy the generally self centeredness and evil of man, and the odd good natured and truly decent person.
laws of probability dictate with such an organization your going to meet several hundred of each, and so secrecy is unlikely to be maintained.
is it too much to have governments watching your every move
Tefal you'r like an osterich with it's head in the sand.
You won't hear about the illuminati in the mainstream media period because directly and indirectly the media are owned by the illuminati. Secondly the mainstream media only employ people with certain political bias and outlook on life, people such as yourself being one example.
Thirdly if a journalist for the BBC did decide to write a story about NWO or Illuminati the editor wouldn't air it as such disclosure could well lead to riots and mass revolts, and also the journalist would probably be fired.
Lastly, there secrecy has been comprimised for many decades though it's only through the internet that it's started to become known by a wider group.
Good grief, you guys are nuts.
There is no world encompassing conspiracy theory. Just a bunch of crappy governments bickering.
yes due to the fact, of once again numbers + the huge and incredible amount of material evidence/data such a task would provide.
for example to watch 100 people all the time you would need something like 50 + people (which is why most high street ect cameras are only actively monitored at certain time the rest is only checked if there is a report.) to watch say the 60 million people i Britain you would need something like 30 million people to watch the screens for America 150 million, china 50million India ~ 500 million.
At the moment we can;t even keep a police station of 100 people quiet, let alone 1 billion + people+ huge amounts of easily copyable data.