Conspiracy theories...

David Icke has quite the following in the US and gets airtime on coastocoastam, the most listened to nighttime talk show in the US, which is focused on conspiracy / fringe theory guests (and sometimes has interesting people and scientists like Michio Kaku and so on as well as mostly cynics trying to sell their latest codded up conspiracy book to the intellectually impoverished trailer trash desperate for meaning beyond the four walls of their ‘static tourer’ and roadkill dinners). I have heard Icke on there and he is a complete loon, the queen and george bush are lizards apparently, not an old lady born into a tradition and a retard elevated by nepotism and money. I think the yanks are better able to buy into him because they didn't see him profess to be the son of god on wogan!
 
There is a 'theory' that when he says lizards, he means jews. I'm not sure what difference that makes though :p

Jon Ronson explores this hypothesis in Them: Adventures with Extremists (2001).

Icke claims that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are a legitimate document, though he insists that they refer to the "Lizard Illuminati", not Jews.

It's a pretty pathetic defence, even for Icke. I mean, if you were going to present evidence for the existence of Lizard Illuminati, the Protocols would have to be the last document on Earth that you'd turn to.

The Protocols were written for one purpose only - and proving the existence of Lizard Illuminati isn't it.
 
More like a genuis, he's worth a fortune all for a bit of ridicule.

There is a 'theory' that when he says lizards, he means jews. I'm not sure what difference that makes though :p

Yes, I am sure he's made a few quid from his books and lectures. Should keep him in magenta jumpsuits, shamanic drugs and zyclon B.:eek:

Have heard about the anti-jewish elements of his theories before and it seems he has backed off it a bit, presumably to keep the book sales coming. he can sound reasonably erudite and lucid for a time and then comes out with things that are so prepostorous and clearly way off.

I suppose better a first rate fringe prophet, zenophobic, lizard hater than a second rate goal keeper. well, actually may be not :)
 
There is a 'theory' that when he says lizards, he means jews. I'm not sure what difference that makes though :p

There isn't a theory about that at all. It was an attempted smear campaign done against him to try and discredit him and brand him a racist/nazi.

Strange how the only place this 'theory' was propagated was in a mainstream documentary involving some leftist group with about 6 members and the help of the ADF.

The documentary called "David Icke - The Lizards and the Jews" can be found on the internet. Here's a synapsis of it

David Icke said:
This is the amazing documentary The Lizards And The Jews - Documentary on David Icke which among other things shows how false accusations of hate crimes (especially antisemitism) are used against people like David Icke who are exposing the power hungry globalist elite and thus preventing all of us to hear alternative views on global events.

"David Icke, The Lizards And The Jews", broadcaster and journalist Jon Ronson encounters one of Britain's most infamous media figures as he continues his search to uncover the truth behind who - or what - is really controlling the world. Tonight Ronson joins David Icke on a lecture tour that takes the ex-sports broadcaster headlong into controversy as his extraordinary views dismay his detractors and inspire his audiences, providing a fascinating insight into extremists - and how the public responds to them.

David Icke was once the most ridiculed man in Britain after declaring on The Terry Wogan Show that he was the Son of God. But he has now resurrected his career and is an internationally successful conspiracy investigator who lectures to packed houses world-wide. His latest theory is that the ruling elite are genetically descended from a race of 12-foot blood-drinking, shape-shifting lizards. But when Icke says lizards does he just actually mean lizards, as he steadfastly maintains? Or does he, as a powerful coalition of prominent Jewish groups claim, mean Jews?

Ronson witnesses the media circus that ensues from Icke's tour of Canada. The Anti-Defamation League (ADF), the world's most powerful Jewish defence organization, and a coalition of leftist campaigners strongly oppose Icke's tour. The ADL believe that 'lizard' is code word for Jews, but Icke vehemently denies this. They point out that Icke has many followers on the extreme right. The hardcore neo-Nazis Unit Combat 18 once attended a lecture of his in London and gave him a glowing review in their newsletter. Old anti-Semitic cartoons from Eastern Europe portray Jews in a lizard-type way. Is this just coincidence?
In Vancouver, a coalition of prominent anti-racists call an emergency anti-Icke meeting. One member comments, "Above all, I think David Icke represents a political threat, because his writings are anti-Semitic." Efforts are also made by protestors to have Icke deported and his book seized and incinerated under Canadian Hate Crimes Legislation.

Icke is invited to a book signing at one of Canada's biggest book chains unaware that they have received calls warning about possible violent demonstrations. As a result, the book signing is called off. Following this, two radio interviews are cancelled. Icke views these attacks as part of dynamics of the conspiracy which prevent the truth from being told and calls one of the offending radio station managers "one of the architects, unknowingly, of the destruction of our freedom."

But the anti-Icke coalition begins to fall apart. The powerful Canadian Jewish Congress has already withdrawn, stunned by the lack of public support. The few remaining protestors resort to desperate measures. They decide to toss a cream-pie at Icke at a book signing; two protestors don giant lizard outfits as a decoy. In an embarrassing moment they miss, hitting the children's book section instead. 50 min. A must see for everyone.

Here's a clip of it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOESbjdwTRI
 
Last edited:
As you can see, the Beeb wasn't the only station to make this mistake; CNN, Fox News and other stations also reported that the building had collapsed before it actually came down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzMlFFQ2oqQ

WeAreChange.org.uk interview Phillip Hayton about why the BBC reported building 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actualy did and also show video of the building collapsing to a demolitions expert who says it's a defintely a controlled demolition. They also put to Phillip Hayton that The National Institute Of Science and Technology state that even the most plausible reason for tower 7 collapsing is highly unlikely and it was most likely controlled demolition.
 
Last edited:
There isn't a theory about that at all. It was an attempted smear campaign done against him to try and discredit him and brand him a racist/nazi.

Strange how the only place this 'theory' was propagated was in a mainstream documentary involving some leftist group with about 6 members and the help of the ADF.

The documentary called "David Icke - The Lizards and the Jews" can be found on the internet. Here's a synapsis of it

Ronson writes about this incident in his book, so I know all about it. But the link with the Protocols is made by Icke himself in his own publications, and cannot be so easily dismissed.
 
I don't suppose anyone watched the programme on C4 earlier this morning? All about this, coincidentally.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzMlFFQ2oqQ

WeAreChange.org.uk interview Phillip Hayton about why the BBC reported building 7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actualy did and also show video of the building collapsing to a demolitions expert who says it's a defintely a controlled demolition.

CNN, Fox and several other media organisations all made the same claim. Did they interview these guys as well, or just the BBC?

They also put to Phillip Hayton that The National Institute Of Science and Technology state that even the most plausible reason for tower 7 collapsing is highly unlikely and it was most likely controlled demolition.

False.


NIST has released a video and still-photo analysis of 7 World Trade Center before its collapse that appears to indicate a greater degree of structural damage from falling debris than originally assumed by FEMA. Specifically, NIST's interim report on 7 World Trade Center displays photographs of the southwest façade of the building that show it to have significant damage.

The report also highlights a 10-story gash in the center of the south façade, toward the bottom, extending approximately a quarter of the way into the interior.

A unique aspect of the design of 7 World Trade Center was that each outer structural column was responsible for supporting 2,000 sq ft (186 m²) of floor space, suggesting that the simultaneous removal of a number of columns severely compromised the structure's integrity.

Consistent with this theory, news footage shows cracking and bowing of the building's east wall immediately before the collapse, which began at the penthouse floors.

In video of the collapse, taken from the north by CBS News and other news media, the first visible sign of collapse is movement in the east penthouse 8.2 seconds before the north wall began to collapse, which took at least another 7 seconds.

[...]

The hypothesis, which was reiterated in a June 2007 status update, is that an initial failure in a critical column occurred below the 13th floor, caused by damage from fire and/or debris from the collapse of the two main towers.

The collapse progressed vertically up to the east mechanical penthouse. The interior structure was unable to handle the redistributed load, resulting in horizontal progression of the failure across lower floors, particularly the 5th to 7th floors. This resulted in "a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure."

[...]

NIST states it has "found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event".

Wikipedia.
 
I don't suppose anyone watched the programme on C4 earlier this morning? All about this, coincidentally.

No missed it. I have 4od and checked on that but it says the programme is currently unavavilable. When do shown programmes become available on 4od?
 
Best theory ever:

"It's a known fact, Sonny Jim,
that a secret society...

...of the five wealthiest people,
known as the Pentavirate...

...run everything in the world,
including the newspapers...

...and meet tri-annually at a secret
mansion in Colorado known as...

-..."The Meadows."
-Who's in the Pentavirate?

The Queen, the Vatican,
the Gettys, the Rothschilds...

...and Colonel Sanders,
before he went ****-up

I hated the Colonel,
with his wee beady eyes...

...and that smug look on his face.
"You're gonna buy my chicken. Oh!"

Dad, how can you hate the Colonel?

He puts addictive chemicals
in chicken...

...making you crave it fortnightly,
smart-ass!"

Name that film;)
 

No they just decided to change there official version of what happened. I wonder if any pressure was applied to them?

Evangelion said:
NIST has released a video and still-photo analysis of 7 World Trade Center before its collapse that appears to indicate a greater degree of structural damage from falling debris than originally assumed by FEMA.

Happen to have a link to these phots and video? The only one I can find is this one :-

Abcnews-wtc7damage.jpg


Yes a blurrred photo from ABC news, that overides the opinion of many independant structual engineers and demolition experts.
 
A phone call to BBC's Jane Standley who reported the collapse of The Salomon Brothers Building (7WTC) a full 45 minutes prior to the collapse raising massive questions as to the BBC's use of clairvoyants and sooth sayers. With this power, many critics are asking why the BBC were not able to predict the entire event. Complacency or a conspiracy?!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3B1dRN2xvg&feature=related

As soon as he asks about 9/11 she goes cold and claims shes busy.
 
No they just decided to change there official version of what happened. I wonder if any pressure was applied to them?

They didn't change anything! Where's your proof that they "decided to change their official version of what happened"? There's no proof, because they didn't change it.

Happen to have a link to these phots and video? The only one I can find is this one :-

Abcnews-wtc7damage.jpg


Yes a blurrred photo from ABC news, that overides the opinion of many independant structual engineers and demolition experts.

How so?
 
As soon as he asks about 9/11 she goes cold and claims shes busy.

So would I if I'd had to field a few hundred conspiracy calls already.

Why didn't they call CNN, Fox, or any of the other media organisations which carried the same report? I keep asking this question, but you keep avoiding it.
 
So would I if I'd had to field a few hundred conspiracy calls already.

Why didn't they call CNN, Fox, or any of the other media organisations which carried the same report? I keep asking this question, but you keep avoiding it.

Maybe because there's plenty of footage of her standing right in front of the building saying it's collapsed 20 minutes before it did.

You have any links to the CNN, Fox reports of the building collapsing before it did?
 
You haven't shown us any "real questionable stuff". You've just made a load of unsubstantiated comments, and ignored the logical flaws in your own statements.

You're simply posting stuff without thinking it through. The sheer irrationality of what you're saying doesn't seem to worry you.

This worries me.

Where has anything i've said been irrational or even debunked as impossible?

All you can say is that we don't know for a fact what their agenda is but these groups certainly exist and trends in the western world plus the state of the system seems to go along with some of the theories, and those logical flaws you claim, when someone has posted what they thought i expanded on what could be going on, then i thought it was time i showed a few clips for you all to find questionable yourself, even magick then followed up with some decent info on the group.

I certainly don't share a belief in most of the rubbish on the subject but when faced with some real questionable stuff i can't totally deny it and walk away, if theres anything in it then i will be open while trying to keep some reason and scepticism, perhaps i do play devils advocate a bit to get my point across and make others question whats going on as well but i only do it because most wouldn't look let alone think outside the box otherwise.


Anyway here is what I wanted everyone to see, now tell me if you think this a good thing, honestly? no conflict of interests let alone being downright bizarre, especially considering a guy like bush actually won a second time even with suspicious voting issues but that's another thing...

The trouble with conspiracy theories is the amount of obvious rubbish and how people managed to form so many links, however if you look at certain things on their own it seems bad enough, for instance watch this short (30 sec) video where bush and kerry admit to being in a secret society, no not one guy running for president but two are in da club and what a nice name it has too!

There's a few 'clubs' like that where people of high positions in government and business can join, they even go on big days out together sometimes and get up to questionable stuff, though its ok im sure because its all just a bit of harmless fun!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7348698445374958940

and just for fun... :p
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO5WoLnOOlU

Another little (43 sec) video of bush when asked about 911, his reaction seems very strange indeed, so much so the reporter tries to lighten the mood by joking, are these signs of knowledge and possibly even guilt showing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCvqXXnxLZw

Anyway i don't want to get into that particular CT as everyone is tired of it, I just remembered the video and thought others might find it it funny/interesting, i don't believe bush could be behind much of anything though.
 
Maybe because there's plenty of footage of her standing right in front of the building saying it's collapsed 20 minutes before it did.

She wasn't "right in front of the building"; you can see from the photo that she's actually in another building, several blocks away:

827janestandley20500817oz8.jpg


You have any links to the CNN, Fox reports of the building collapsing before it did?

Not immediately to hand, but it is well documented that these reports were made. See the post here.
 
Back
Top Bottom