• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

R4800 to be released after the GT200, says Tom's

Soldato
Joined
17 Aug 2003
Posts
20,160
Location
Woburn Sand Dunes
THIS THREAD IS NOT FOR ARGUING ABOUT/DISCUSSING DRIVER ISSUES!

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ati-radeon-4800,5375.html


We previously published several details about AMD’s next-generation graphics card lineup and as we get closer to the launch we are getting more details about the launch date, feature set and prices. The good news: The new boards will come with “physics processing capability” and prices that will start below $200 for a 512 MB board. The bad news: The 4800 series will launch after Nvidia’s GT200.

Yes, we know, we previously said that the 4800 series would launch in May, but as it stands right now, we won’t be seeing the first new cards until mid-June. According To AMD’s current introduction schedule, the Radeon 4800 series will launch in week 25, which puts the day of the introduction somewhere between June 15 and June 22. What is significant about this time frame is that ATI will trail Nvidia and their new high-end chip GT200.

This comes as a major surprise, because it was widely expected that ATI will debut its RV770 chip first, followed by Nvidia’s summer part. But as it stands right now, Nvidia has the pole position in a new round of the graphics wars. Of course, the GT200 and RV770 are actually not entirely comparable, because of their huge price difference. But performance-wise, we’re in for a possibly close race.

ATI’s Radeon 4800 series will be introduced in three flavors - as 4850, 4870 and 4870 X2. The company will also offer a “4850 256MB” (as opposed to 512 MB in other versions), but this SKU is a so-called "option" and is geared towards to the OEM/ODM/SI crowd to support them with cheaper parts for the back-to-school period and beyond.

The Radeon 4850, code-named “Makedon,” is AMD’s launch board. The name, by the way, is likely to refer to Terry "Catalyst" Makedon, group manager for software and video in the AMD (ATI) graphics division. Of course, there is a small chance that Alexander Makedonski (Alexander the Great) may have influenced the naming, but somehow we feel that Terry has won this time.

The 4850 board features 512 MB of GDDR3 memory and is expected to be available in volume at launch. We heard that card vendors will start printing their boxes next week, which means that the specifications are final at this time. According to our sources, the 4850 will come with single-slot cooling; CrossFireX is supported with up to four boards in a single system (if you have the appropriate board based on AMD 790FX, 790GX, Intel Skulltrail, X48) and each board will require a single 6-pin PCIe power connector.

AMD will follow up in July and launch the Radeon 4870 512 MB GDDR5 and the 4870 X2 1024 MB GDDR5 (R700). The Radeon 4870 chip is built onto a board codenamed “Trojan” (could be named after a condom brand or a horse; we pick the latter) and comes with a dual-slot cooler, following the tradition of earlier XX70 boards. Our previous information about the memory buffer was a bit inaccurate, since the cost of Qimonda’s GDDR5 memory apparently was not compatible with the targeted pricing of these cards. The 4870 includes 512MB GDDR5 memory and surpasses upcoming Nvidia cards in terms of bandwidth. However, if any ATI partner wants to build a 1024 MB GDDR5 board, ATI will not say no, we were told. But don’t expect this to happen until early fall, since everybody wants to move as many units as possible.

In terms of performance, we heard some interesting claims. A 4870 should perform on par with or better than a dual-chip 3870 X2. Our sources explained to us that using a PCIe Gen1 controller 3870 X2 was a mistake, since the board was hungry for data and didn’t sync well with this interface. Don’t expect the ATI team to repeat that mistake with the 4870 X2. However, we admit that we have no idea what kind of connection two RV770 GPUs will have.

Looking at features, ATI will promote DirectX 10.1, PCI Express 2.0, dynamic geometry acceleration and other functions that were introduced with the Radeon 3800 series. What surprises us is that the manufacturer is highlighting a "Game physics processing capability" in its launch materials. Since ATI didn’t bid for Havok (which ended up in Intel’s lap) and Nvidia snapped up PhysX we wonder who provides a physics engine for ATI. Perhaps the company took a completely different direction and it simply expanded its GPGPU capabilities from professional FireStream cards to the desktop.

The Radeon 4800 series also includes 7.1 channel-via-HDMI support and color output also got a “significant” boost, our sources said. We were unable to confirm HDMI 1.3 support, but we would not be surprised if that in fact is the case. The Unified Video Decoder is now in generation 2 and is called "UVD2".

Every aspect of the GPU is monitored by PowerPlay, since ATI will be very aggressive on the power side: The boards have been designed with power in mind and the 4850/4870 won’t require 8+6-pin combinations (exception: The dual-GPU 4870 X2). Power supply requirements call for a 450 watt unit for a single card and a 550 watt version for two cards. Given the fact that ATI has to state this for PoS power supplies, CrossFire should do just fine with a top notch 400 watt power supply.

Let’s talk about pricing. AMD decided to remain aggressive in an effort to win back market share. Pricing is actually set to a point where Nvidia is unlikely to be able to compete (that is at least what somebody is hoping for). Pricing guidelines are not finalized at this time, but according to several sources, the Radeon 4850 will succeed the 3850 512MB and should cost about $189-$219 at launch. Our sources indicated that 4870 GDDR5 cards will cost between $249 and $279, but somehow we feel that AMD might aim go for $199 and $249 at launch.

Given the current market, these prices could stir up the market and create quite a circus. Radeon cards could be getting lots of design wins for the back-to-school market, but our sources warned us that ATI is a bit late to the party. Qualifying of systems takes time, and tens of thousands of machines take time to be manufactured and shipped to North America. For Europe, things are more lenient, since nobody works in August and schools/universities start in September or October.

All in all, ATI will have one helluwa June and July. All eyes are now on Nvidia: Will Nvidia create a decent competitor for the sub-$300 range (55nm G92 is being prepared), or will AMD/ATI will gain market share?


--------------------------------------------

What's your view on this guys? its going to be quite interesting if this is true. It would throw a totally different light on this whole 'nvidia are responsible for no new technology' notion that's being banded about.
 
Last edited:
I'm just glad that it sounds like the GT200 will be comming out next month then? :)

After shelling out £430 or so on a 9800GX2 (Knowing full well that when Nvidia put out a "GX2", they are about to release something far better after a few months - ala 7950GX2 -> 8800GTX!!!)

The 9800GX2 just doesnt cut the mustard with Crysis (gawd knows how i played it with my 8800GTX), i just hope the GT200 just beats the snot out of the GX2 after a quick sale on the bay, im sure it will.

Thanks for the info.
 
there's another thread for arguing about driver releases, keep it out of this one please. people sight ati's month lywhql's and performance improvements as a plus point....perhaps nvidsia has nothing left to improve. its not like their new whql's offer any gaming improvement at all for my 8800gtx over the 169 whqls. but like said, keep it out of this thread!
 
Last edited:
mate, you're a bit off... you prefer having to faff about with dodgy Beta drivers, not to mention the constant and random crashes / blue screens you get off off of nVidia drivers, to one or 2 drivers a month that actually work, and usually improve performance?

All those problems are new to me.

there's another thread for arguing about driver releases, keep it out of this one please. people site ati's month whql's and performance improvements as a plus point....perhaps nvidsia has nothing left to improve. its not like their new whql's offer any gaming improvement at all for my 8800gtx over the 169 whqls. but like said, keep it out of this thread!

Well thats for your card, whql's have here, anyway I'm not the one who started all this its the idiot trying to call people a fanboy for no reason.
 
hurray for cheap parts from ATI danke! nvidia high-end is always £350-400 no? don't know why ppl always hope for sub £300 as it never happens, ripoff island that is britain w00t
 
Yet another thread ruined by a flame war!!



Back to the thread. Some good info there, cheer's. That 4870 looks promising, especially if it launches at that price point. Basically, if you have just bought a 3870x2 you have wasted your money. It will be interesting to see just how little power these things require. A quality 400-450w psu for crossfire is looking good though. Hopefully they will run cooler too.
 
GT200 is a high end product, RV770 is a value product. R700 is the dual gpu high end and remains to be seen whether the crossfire implementation will be better this time.

G92b should if its just a shrink will not be able to win against RV770, that is my prediction. GT200 will probbaly be the best single GPU in its price range as i cant make prediction on R700.
 
I doubt it yes. People with X2s,GX2s and Crossfire set ups will be looking at 4870 X2 R700 GPU which should offer at least 2x the performance of the current X2(possibly more as implied by the article above).

ATi has been working on multi gpus for a while, when they manage to make the multi gpu set up look like a single gpu they will have a really great advantage.
 
No, 4870 is an upper mainstream product, much like the 3870 was when it first launched.

High end for ATi fro now on will probably be Dual GPU X2 cards.

So ATi's high end is going to be a dual GPU product to compete with a single GPU product from NV? Surely the 4870 is high end and the 4870X2 ultra high end, I mean the 4870 wont be no slow coach it sure will be a powerfull card proberbly faster than the 3870X2 and maybe the 9800GX2?

I doubt it yes. People with X2s,GX2s and Crossfire set ups will be looking at 4870 X2 R700 GPU which should offer at least 2x the performance of the current X2(possibly more as implied by the article above).

ATi has been working on multi gpus for a while, when they manage to make the multi gpu set up look like a single gpu they will have a really great advantage.

I dont think they will try and make it look like one core, I mean you dont see C2D's and quad cores looking like one CPU core do you? They just need to sort the crossfire/SLi problems out so that they litrally perform up to the full potential all the time.
 
Last edited:
I doubt it yes. People with X2s,GX2s and Crossfire set ups will be looking at 4870 X2 R700 GPU which should offer at least 2x the performance of the current X2(possibly more as implied by the article above).

ATi has been working on multi gpus for a while, when they manage to make the multi gpu set up look like a single gpu they will have a really great advantage.

Possibly, i mean with certain games the single chip card will have the advantage over last gen x2's & GX2's like in Crysis where SLI/Crossfire hardly affects it. Shame they dont release patches for all games to work as good as the best SLI coded games where you see almost 100% increase like UT3 etc
 
Will read it from the top... It was heading into a debate about who has better driver’s way before I noted it. Are the drivers for these new cards mentioned anywhere in the op?

Anyway away from that, I hope ATI introduce some of the features stated in the OP. 7.1 sound over HDMI sounds really good providing their implementation of it is far better than the half hearted implementation on the 3xxx series of cards many of which had no real support, neither did they come with the required adapter from third parties who outlined on their packaging that they were capable of sound over HDMI.

One of the more significant things that I see here is the introduction of the "Game physics processing capability" I have to wonder what improvements if any this will introduce, is it just marketing? Nvidia have also been in the frame of recent with similar after they purchased PhysX but as far as I know and feel free to put me right here. Recent drivers are being used which boosts performance with PhysX based games on PhysX PPU’s and Nvidia based graphics cards.

Now years ago I used the HAVOK engine to programme a game for my Uni dissertation, this involved simply calling procedures and setting 3DS Max models with certain properties before bringing models etc into Director, now my question is this... If a game is optimised for one of these engines which is more likely to be PhysX with “TWIMTBP” games then why is ATI introducing physics on card with what is presumably its own implementation? In reality it will have very few games, if any games optimised for its use? Does anybody have any thoughts on this or is my understanding of physics processing on the GPU flawed?

Finally it is nice to see the lower power requirements of these new pieces of hardware providing these allegations are true we should be seeing more power from our cards with no more power consumption at the wall. This can only be a good thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom