WhoopsI divided by fuel cost, not multiplied...
![]()
[TW]Fox;11699863 said:a) I have not complained about my road tax going up beyond 'this is a nuisance, how silly, never mind'
b) I am not in the financial position to be blowing £18,000 on a brand new MPV
If £400 a year is a huge deal to you then you must reconsider whether you really are in the position to afford to spend £18k on an SMax, quite frankly.
Not that I'm going to win in a thread full of people trying to justify their purchase of a ridiculously expensive appliance to themselves, anyway.
You done understand where I'm coming from. Ok, you go and see 2 identical a. You've made your mind up that this is the car you want, you're going to keep it 3 years so you just need to decide which one to buy. One of the cars is £1200 more than other, which do you buy?
If you like the diesel power delivery or just don't care then why on earth would you choose the one which is going to cost you more Monet for an otherwise identical car?
Now a lot of people don't like diesels and its worth it to them to pay the extra for a petrol engine. That's absolutely fine as everyone has there own reasons for choosing a car, but doesn't change the fact that a diesel is cheaper
You done understand where I'm coming from. Ok, you go and see 2 identical cars. You've made your mind up that this is the car you want, you're going to keep it 3 years so you just need to decide which one to buy. One of the cars is £1200 more than other, which do you buy? If you take the diesel/petrol preference out of the equation then this is what you are looking at.
If you like the diesel power delivery or just don't care then why on earth would you choose the one which is going to cost you more money for an otherwise identical car?
[TW]Fox;11700443 said:You completely miss the point. The point is that, financially, the two are so close that it doesn't make any difference - £400 is neither here nor there in terms of total cost of ownership over three years. It is a non-issue and therefore should not be used as a consideration.
Instead, you should pick the one you liked best rather than go for one you dont like quite as much simply becuase it will save you a minute amount of money. Your idea that the finance issue helps you pick between two identical cars is flawed as they are not identical cars - they have different engines which alter the character of the car.
There are people out there, lots of them, who beleive that now, you need a diesel. They dont care about the maths, they refuse to do the sums or are unable to, they think you need a diesel to save money and thats that. This is wrong.
I was in my local BMW Dealer today and whilst I was waiting for the service guy I got chatting to one of the salesmen - he told me that despite the fact BMW's new petrol engines are ultra efficient, fast, refined, smooth and basically astounding, they sell very few of them - the vast majority of the cars they sell are the diesels. Becuase hey, in the eyes of Joe Public, DIESEL = LESS MONEY INNIT.
This is ridiculous.
[TW]Fox;11700497 said:Until its out of warranty and it drops a turbo or eats its injectors. Whooops. Bored of reading 'My turbo died' threads on the BMW forums now.
We aren't here to discuss the poor components quality of BMWs now are we.

Dont think there is a 2.5 TD on the S-Max cheif, unless you mean 2.5T?
Isn't that pretty much the same with most manufacturers though.Looked at the new Galaxy and Zafia this weekend too. Not impressed. In fact, pretty much all the Ford range look the same, just bigger models as you go up.
Isn't that pretty much the same with most manufacturers though.
Regardless of cost issues, I still find diesels unpleasant to drive, the noise, lack of refinement and a power curve that I just don't like makes them non starters for me