Astronut vid.

As I recall the image editing is true (partially) - images did get edited. However, while there was a policy of editing images (mostly for clarity), and a department responsible for it, that policy didn't include deliberate cover-ups of unknown objects. That probably arose from some misguided individuals who took the policy too far.

Of course, there may well have been knee-jerk initial denials by NASA officials which would have fed the theorists and given rise to the cover-up theory.

The rest of it, well, what can I say. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
benji182 said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/4977134.stm
Click to expand...

Old-age pensioners can't pay their fuel bills, countries are invaded to award oil contracts to the West, and meanwhile secretive parts of the secret government are sitting on suppressed technology for free energy.
Click to expand...

Unsubstantiated claim #1.

There was a group called the Disclosure Project. They published a book which had 400 expert witnesses ranging from civilian air traffic controllers, through military radar operators, right up to the chaps who were responsible for whether or not to launch nuclear missiles.

They are some very credible, relied upon people, all saying yes, there is UFO technology, there's anti-mavity, there's free energy, and it's extra-terrestrial in origin, and we've captured spacecraft and reverse-engineered it.
Click to expand...

Unsubstantiated claim #2.

But what came on to the screen was amazing. It was a culmination of all my efforts. It was a picture of something that definitely wasn't man-made.

It was above the Earth's hemisphere. It kind of looked like a satellite. It was cigar-shaped and had geodesic domes above, below, to the left, the right and both ends of it, and although it was a low-resolution picture it was very close up.

This thing was hanging in space, the earth's hemisphere visible below it, and no rivets, no seams, none of the stuff associated with normal man-made manufacturing.
Click to expand...

Unsubstantiated claim #3.

SK: Is it possible this is an artist's impression?

GM: I don't know...
Click to expand...

Reality bites!

SK: Do you have a copy of this? It came down to your machine.

GM: No, the graphical remote viewer works frame by frame. It's a Java application, so there's nothing to save on your hard drive, or at least if it is, only one frame at a time.

SK: So did you get the one frame?

GM: No.
Click to expand...

He finally discovers proof of NASA's top secret techno-coverup and doesn't even save one single frame of the evidence? How odd. :confused:

So basically, we have some guy who hacked into NASA and claims he saw a whole bunch of secret techno-stuff from aliens that the US government is hiding from the rest of the world. Except that he can't prove it because he didn't save any of the evidence to his HDD. He didn't download any copies of the super-secret documents which would have proved everything; he didn't even save one single frame from the images of the alleged alien spacecraft.

Wow, I'm convinced. :rolleyes:
 
the US wanted him pretty bad so they must be hiding something.... lol.

"SK: So did you get the one frame?

GM: No."

he explains why in the bit you didn't include.


i wasn't saying that i believe it. i was just posting what i'd read for all to come to their own conclusions as the topic was already on coverups
 
Last edited:
Indeed. In the current climate he should be thankful he didn't get packed off to Guantanamo (imminent closure or not).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom