This little joke gets pulled but hollyoaks can show full guy on guy tongue wrestling whilst i am eating my tea?!
Insane
again...
You, learn to ****ing read
It's a publicity stunt nothing more.
This little joke gets pulled but hollyoaks can show full guy on guy tongue wrestling whilst i am eating my tea?!
Insane
You, learn to ****ing read
YOu are of inferior spitroasting ability, we don't want you![]()
Tefal said:* impairment of normal physiological function affecting part or all of an organism
See what i mean about people getting up their own arse over terminology and ignoring everything else :/
Illness is suggestive of a poor state of health, or sickness.okies disorder it is
/ol @ definition
Illness is suggestive of a poor state of health, or sickness.
A disorder is a "condition in which there is a disturbance of normal function". Which I guess is accurate, without the stigma. But who's ******* normal anyway.
I don't think homosexuality will fit with that definition very clearly at all. I believe this because homosexuality can be seen in many different species and these records of it being observed in humans for a long long time. Therefore I would say it can't really be described as abnormal.
Also as I said before being homosexual in no way means that you don't desire to have children. They're separate things so I don't see how you could say being gay would impair physiological function. If you did go by that definition that would that mean a lesbian couple who conceive through donor sperm were not ill?
If that's referring to my question it was simple enough! I asked because the term illness has many meanings/definitions. i.e. some people might say none Christians are ill. It's become to broard a word. ♦
Good point, no human being is perfectly balanced with all the correct amounts of whatever neurotransmitters/pheromones/etc they should have,
pretty much because we are all equally imperfect, and that uniqueness is what makes us human.
We all have illnesses in that respect, be it being over extroverted, or liking bananas and marmite on toast, it's all down to our individual neurological make up.
Now can we get off the word illness and on to something more interesting
Give me a word you would rater me use :/
Personally I see it as a genetic defect/abnormality, I don't see how it can be seen any other way tbh, although no doubt people on here will take offence to the word 'defect'.
No we are not, and no it isn't, other wise all animals count as human as they are unique, in fact almost everything counts as human.
No food cravings are more based on dietary needs, tastes are on neurological make up and experience, and also on old survival instincts, but do not impair function so are not illnesses.
And I think I'm, going to nuke you now.....
I cant believe this has turned into another gay thread, i would have thought the last one would have taught people how controvertial the subject is and how easy it is to offend people.
I cant believe this has turned into another gay thread, i would have thought the last one would have taught people how controvertial the subject is and how easy it is to offend people.
I cant believe this has turned into another gay thread, i would have thought the last one would have taught people how controvertial the subject is and how easy it is to offend people.
The genetic differences between 2 bees is far less than that of 2 humans. We are just more complex in general, especially given our sentience.
But what about being introverted? That can directly affect your chances of reproducing negatively. On the flip, being extroverted can positively affect it, in fact, even more so, as spreading ones seed does more for the continuation of the race than only having one set of offspring.
As for the majority thing governing what is normal. Does that make native Americans/Inuits/Aborigines all sufferers of a racial illness? They certainly make up some of the smallest demographics of the human race.
Example:
Tefal, its not an illness. *runs for popcorn and cover*