Conspiracy Files: The Third Tower

mark66 said:
"One of the mysteries of 9/11 is the collapse of the third tower at the World Trade Center, which was never hit by a plane. Is it possible that it was brought down by a controlled demolition"
Click to expand...

erm - no its not

people who are into this stuff are generally retards
 
UnusualSuspect said:
So you're saying 20 floors falling 3-4 floors onto 90+ floors will make the whole structure collapse in a perfect line leaving nothing but some powdered dust at ground zero?

Did you do math in school at all?
Click to expand...

Course it will make the building collapse.

Did you not do science in school at all?
 
UnusualSuspect said:
Isn't it obvious that a fire cannot make a building fall like that? There is absolutely no way. A fire eats away at the place where its situated, so if the building did collapse it would crumble into the parts that have sustained fire damage. To have it collapse in a straight line like that, from roof to floor, is completely ridiculous. The same thing for the two main towers, theres just no way they would fall like they did from fire damage alone.
Click to expand...

Firstly kudos for spelling ridiculous right :D

Secondly so what if the government tore it down. You have a heavily damaged building in center of financial district that could fall in any number of ways, so you blow it up.

I don't believe for one minute this happened of course but casting all common sense aside if it were already pre wired would it make more sense to take it down?

How engineers could have assessed the building flew in a team of demolition experts (remembering all flights were grounded) got them through the gridlock that was Manhattan and wired the building in 8 hours? lol

I would also recommend you watch some Documentary channels on building demolitions. Usually the rip the guts out, destroy half its supporting pillars and rig it to blow from many different floors. You saying people working in the building, passing by each did didn't notice anything?
 
jas72 said:
I would also recommend you watch some Documentary channels on building explosions. Usually the rip the guts out, destroy half its supporting pillars and rig it to blow from many different floors. You saying people working in the building, passing by each did didn't notice anything?
Click to expand...

Or the hundreds of miles of cabling, linking up all the explosives in a set order.
 
AcidHell2 said:
Yes over engineered. Unfortunately 20+ floors falling(they haven't taken that into account) will exert many many times more than the top limit. Then you have the fire which has weakened the steel frame. Remember steel weekends at a temperature far below the melting point.

Go try again..
Click to expand...

The tops fell at near the rate of free fall. The rates of fall indicate that nearly all resistance to the downward acceleration of the tops had been eliminated ahead of them. The forms of resistance, had the collapses been mavity-driven, would include: the destruction of the structural integrity of each story; the pulverization of the concrete in the floor slabs of each story, and other non-metallic objects; and the acceleration of the remains of each story encountered either outward or downward. There would have to be enough energy to overcome all of these forms of resistance and do it rapidly enough to keep up with the near free-fall acceleration of the top.
Click to expand...
 
UnusualSuspect said:
common myth
Click to expand...

It didn't get anwhere near free fall. How do we know that?
In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building. This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.
Click to expand...

watch any video, the debris is falling at free fall, the tower lags behind.

NEXT

Also people like lose change started the stop clock after the top of the building has started to fall.
 
Last edited:
jas72 said:
I would also recommend you watch some Documentary channels on building demolitions. Usually the rip the guts out, destroy half its supporting pillars and rig it to blow from many different floors. You saying people working in the building, passing by each did didn't notice anything?
Click to expand...
This I've read and seen before in many different movies and documents about 9/11. If its true or not, I'll leave it up to you, but here ya go:

Two weeks before 9/11 the head of security for the Twin Towers, Marvin Bush, brother of the President, shut down power and security to the Twin Towers and rewired the building for "Ethernet". The week before 9/11 he removed all bomb sniffer dogs.
Click to expand...

http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/twin-perils.htm
 
I find it really ironic that the armchair engineer conspiracy theorists are calling others stupid.
 
UnusualSuspect said:
Hence, "..near the rate of free fall.". It still fell too fast considering the resistance that was placed beneath it.
Click to expand...

But it's not near the speed of free fall at all. especially when you consider CT start the stop clock at the wrong time, after the top floors have already started to fall.

It starts slow and the more floors there are the faster it falls.

if you are really interested read this
http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf
 
Azagoth said:
The thing is though, do you really think that the US Government (or any other concerned parties for that matter) would allow the BBC to broadcast the programme if it proved beyond any doubt that there was foul play?
Click to expand...

Well the us government has tried and failed to suppress stuff before, eg the video from the cockpit of plane involved in the friendly fire incident.

Not that I believe any of this conspiracy stuff.
 
:rolleyes:
comparing it to other buildings, even though it's a totally different design to any other skyscrape. They haven't even said it's significantly different to any other design.

Taking comments from architects. WTF they know nothing...

This is unbelievable..
 
kempythe2nd said:
Are you being sarcastic or are you saying you know more about buildings then architects?
Click to expand...

no way am I being sarcastic. Architectures are that they design the look the building. Nothing more. They are like an artist. They are not structural engineers or experts.

read the pdf i linked to above or go searching for your own sources. What they are saying in this documentary is BS and they are interviewing *** wrong people who have no idea what they are talking about. They are talking well well outside there areas of expertise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom