I actually said I think it's a good movie! As a superhero/action/adventure/blockbuster it fits the bill very well. What I don't get is why the critics are raving about it so much and suggesting it's more than what it actually is. I'm just saying that I don't understand what it is that (apparently) elevates it above other very good movies of the same kind. I couldn't see anything special, apart from Heath Ledger. The script, acting, directing, music, effects, etc, etc were all pretty standard for such a movie - good but not remarkable. I just didn't see why I'm supposed to rate it more highly than, say, Iron Man or even Batman Begins.