Have to agree. The above posted roadster does look especially nice though, is that an original front bumper/spoiler thing on the roadster?
Cars that arn't mainstream beatiful.
- Thread starter K.C. Leblanc
- Start date
Have to agree. The above posted roadster does look especially nice though, is that an original front bumper/spoiler thing on the roadster?
Yes, it looks like the Aero kit and it does make a massive difference comapred to standard even though the actual differences are pretty subtle to the untrained eye.
The pre-facelift suffers badly due to the orange indicators and the round front fogs.
Yes mate its a Interceptor
The maestro?
The Maestro Turbo was epic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYB0TOVMjiU&feature=related
Good lord Mr Moto Build looks young there!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYB0TOVMjiU&feature=related
Good lord Mr Moto Build looks young there!
Last edited:
The hot one, yes. If I recall correctly, it didn't go to production until Tony Pond had signed off on the handling.
Contemporary mags certainly rated it very highly.
But yet you still get the ignorant ones who go 'omgzlolmaestrobangerlulziamtehfunnyyyyy!!!!!!!!112eeventyfive'
*n
Yep Yep, really fancy a 190 at the moment to toy with.
Wasn't this the 0-60 in under 6 seconds beast? Was a fantastic handling and performing car as i recall, just a shame the body disentergrated around it!
Quite, prices seem to hover around 4k - although I've seen them go for quite a bit less.
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/603701.htm
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/665393.htm
Wasn't there an issue with the brakes on the Maestro Turbo?
Deleted member 66701
Deleted member 66701
EDIT:-
Infact I've misunderstood the original post/question. I don't think it's a beautiful car at all - just that it doesn't seem as ugly now as when it was released.
******************************************
Not mainstream beautiful?
My Cosworth.
Although I do think it has aged rather well - IMO looks better now than it did in 1995-1998 - maybe a little ahead of its time/too bold by Ford?
Infact I've misunderstood the original post/question. I don't think it's a beautiful car at all - just that it doesn't seem as ugly now as when it was released.
******************************************
Not mainstream beautiful?
My Cosworth.
Although I do think it has aged rather well - IMO looks better now than it did in 1995-1998 - maybe a little ahead of its time/too bold by Ford?
Last edited by a moderator:
Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 16,120
- Location
- Chengdu
All alfa's are brilliant looking and most of the press/public agree, except the odd wierdo like Gilly
TRUTH!
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 9,960
- Location
- London UK
That was the first car to come to mind when I read the thread title. Beatiful!
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,344
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
Some of the things in this thread I hold no judgement on, but how anyone car think the multipla looks good is beyond me.
It looks like two ugly cars put together to create double ugliness. Not to mention the only people who drive them are old fat women with many kids.
I think the Z4 is controversial because it's a blonde womans car, going down the road putting makeup on, steering with her breasts, you know the type, however it is a good looking car.
I quite like the B5 passat, it's curvy yet people underestimate it's potential to be jagged.
It looks like two ugly cars put together to create double ugliness. Not to mention the only people who drive them are old fat women with many kids.
I think the Z4 is controversial because it's a blonde womans car, going down the road putting makeup on, steering with her breasts, you know the type, however it is a good looking car.
I quite like the B5 passat, it's curvy yet people underestimate it's potential to be jagged.
Last edited: