Soldato
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 11,788
- Location
- Somewhere
So under what conditions can these strangelets cause non-strange matter to become strange?
i assume they have done similar tests reaching say 50.000 times hotter than the heart of the Sun. A step by step approach is more reasonable i want to believe.
i trust those scientists but i am worried because this is extreme science and humans arent perfect. I take their words for granted because science job is not to tell lies , thats religions job
Isn't space around the order of 3 kelvin?
Isn't space around the order of 3 kelvin?
So under what conditions can these strangelets cause non-strange matter to become strange?
conditions like those recreated in CERN can be found in space? or is it the first time since the bang?
I never said it could. I believe the main reason we haven't had a problem so far is because the particles created decay quickly + their charge means they're repelled from regular matter. There are loads of theories regards this stuff so if you want to learn more about it I'd read up on the experiments described on the
Brookhaven Lab website I linked earlier.
Well I just ask because one of my professors is working on the LHC and was telling me how the strange matter 'problem' is the only one he can't completely rule out. He said that the whole issue stems from the possibility of 'normal' matter being only a metastable state of matter and strange matter being at base stability.
The Interplanetary Medium is local, to a solar system (any solar system.) The Sun radiates charged particles (the solar wind.) This permeates throughout the solar system, to the heliopause.
CMB is the residual echo of the big-bang, i.e. approx. 2.7 degrees above Absolute Zero - actually the first light exuded by the creation of the Universe at circa 400,000 years or so.
The Interplanetary Medium is local, to a solar system (any solar system.) The Sun radiates charged particles (the solar wind.) This permeates throughout the solar system, to the heliopause.
Generally speaking though scientists don't like to rule anything completely out, especially when it comes to exploring high energy physics!
I misread that last bit then and thought you were saying the Universe came to be 400 000 years ago
Then I read more carefully.
I misread that last bit then and thought you were saying the Universe came to be 400 000 years ago
Then I read more carefully.
That's why I also cited the interstellar and intergalactic media
Also, 'Solar System' refers specifically to the planetary system around our star, Sol, not to any old planetary system. One of my bugbears, that, sorry![]()
I don't s'pose there'd be much time to react if a black hole suddenly swallowed us up though, right?![]()
That's not quite true. The possibility is real, if minuscule. We just don't know enough about high energy physics to be totally sure, hence why we're doing the experiment.
Burnsy
That's probably true, but with the STFC incessantly bleating about cutbacks it really doesn't give out a good image, does it?Substantial funds now come from charitable organisations as well as private backing. Of course you also have massive research councils giving out grants. The HEFCE alone gave out £7 billion last year in research funding - and you know most of that was for part privately funded work.
Not to mention all those thousands of volunteers helping out via LHC@home. Maybe Bush was right - Iraq's WMDs were on their computer screens.Yes, you're right. All of the academics and PhD physicists working on this from hundreds of countries around the world are, in fact, secretly trying to design a weapon system for the military.
MooI'm getting so bored of people claiming that the LHC could end the world or swallow up the galaxy or turn us all into cows (etc etc).