2008 Italian GP - Race 14/18

I know at the beginning of the season Mclaren had a 25bhp advantage but, owing to the FIA and there allowance of teams to tinker with the engine [to improve reliability and supposedly reduce costs] Ferrari have significantly more power than they started with.
thing is, ferrari lost performance due to standard ECU's, maybe they finally working that out? I dunno...
 
Has anyone else noticed that when we get an on-board shot of a Toyota, it never seems to be struggling for traction even when every other car is bouncing off the rev limiter and scrabbling to try and get some purchase on the track?

Take the start in Spa - if La Source was any further away from the starting grid, Trulli would have been in the lead. He was so much faster than the cars around him. Glock didn't exactly struggle to get it off the line either. And at Monza - the TV switches to an on-board of one of the Toyotas, James Allen says 'listen to this car without TC'....and the car accelerates out of Ascari with barely a hint of wheelspin compared to the rest of the field.

They may not be using traction control as such, as they aren't getting the misfiring soundtrack whenever they apply the power. But they seem to be doing something, IMO.
 
Has anyone else noticed that when we get an on-board shot of a Toyota, it never seems to be struggling for traction even when every other car is bouncing off the rev limiter and scrabbling to try and get some purchase on the track?

Take the start in Spa - if La Source was any further away from the starting grid, Trulli would have been in the lead. He was so much faster than the cars around him. Glock didn't exactly struggle to get it off the line either. And at Monza - the TV switches to an on-board of one of the Toyotas, James Allen says 'listen to this car without TC'....and the car accelerates out of Ascari with barely a hint of wheelspin compared to the rest of the field.

They may not be using traction control as such, as they aren't getting the misfiring soundtrack whenever they apply the power. But they seem to be doing something, IMO.


hmm have you noticed this with williams? (this would make it more likely its the engine driveability).


I must admit i noticed it with toyota too.


Germany 2008, i know it aint wet and its a few races ago but lots of wheel spin out of slow corners http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oCoqqzi0rA

cant find any newer clips
 
Last edited:
hmm have you noticed this with williams? (this would make it more likely its the engine driveability).

None of the TV directors seem to like using Williams on-board shots any more. Really need to see how the two cars deal with the same spot on a track.

I must admit i noticed it with toyota too.

Well, I'm not completely crazy then.

Unless....unless I'm so crazy that I'm imagining you agreeing with me!




Maybe I should go get some caffeine into me....
 
None of the TV directors seem to like using Williams on-board shots any more. Really need to see how the two cars deal with the same spot on a track.



Well, I'm not completely crazy then.

Unless....unless I'm so crazy that I'm imagining you agreeing with me!




Maybe I should go get some caffeine into me....

only thing i could say is trulli is known to be a good driver... I wonder if Toyota have any Benetton laptops hiding somewhere... ;)
 
I was under the impression that engine development was frozen from the start of the year (correct me please), so any changes are scrutinsed rather heavily, so performance improvements may most probably come from gearbox/oil type/further transmission loss negation?

Or as someone said, optimising the ECU's from the start of the season.
 
I was under the impression that engine development was frozen from the start of the year (correct me please), so any changes are scrutinsed rather heavily, so performance improvements may most probably come from gearbox/oil type/further transmission loss negation?

Or as someone said, optimising the ECU's from the start of the season.

ferrari upgraded con rods for "cost" savings....
 
Why don't they just go ahead and make F1 a spec series? It's obvious that they want to, and it'll make for great racing in the two years before all the teams get bored and bugger off....
 
Why don't they just go ahead and make F1 a spec series? It's obvious that they want to, and it'll make for great racing in the two years before all the teams get bored and bugger off....
We have A1 for that kind of racing :)

Or even that new series where football clubs sponsor racing cars :o
 
Mosley wants standard engine for F1:
http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news/detail/080917140331.shtml

aaaaghhhh - enough with the tinkering!

Max has only got a year or so before he's outta here......although I'm hoping he gets choked a little too hard during his next visit to the "dungeon".

F1 is unique in having each team develop their own car and select their engine. If they can't do that then its not F1.
Turning more into F1.5

You mean F0.5!
 
max comes out with these crazy ideas just to push the teams into agreeing more reasonable things

i doubt many of the teams will want him to leave just like the last time they begged him to stay he is a easy target really
 
Teams have been testing this week in Jerez.

Is it me or does the new F1 rear wing rules for '09 look ridiculous?

574_50114_2.jpg
 
Teams have been testing this week in Jerez.

Is it me or does the new F1 rear wing rules for '09 look ridiculous?

574_50114_2.jpg

Yes, they do.

What is the new rule? Why will reducing downforce make for better sport?

FIA consfuse me sometimes. is it just to keep a mates mates carbon composite company in business or something.
 
Isn't that tiny rear wing there so that cars behind can follow fairly closely without getting caught up in an aerodynamic barrier zone?
 
Is it me or does the new F1 rear wing rules for '09 look ridiculous?

No more ridiculous than the 'narrow-track' cars looked in '98 after so many years of wide cars, and no more ridiculous than they looked when they recently started sprouting those Batmobile-esque fins on the engine covers, and no more ridiculous than the first winged cars must have looked in '68/'69 when folks were so used to 'clean' looking cars. If everyone on the grid next season is sporting a rear wing like that, we'll be completely used to them by the time they leave Melbourne. Maybe even sooner.
 
Back
Top Bottom