• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

E6600 Vs newer cpus ?

Dicehunter

Dicehunter

Dicehunter

Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2007
Posts
15,372
Location
Northampton
I have a 2nd machine with an E6600 in it clocked to 3.6ghz on a Asus P5W DH Deluxe mobo and i was wondering, in % how much better is say a E8600 the new E0 stepping ?
 
Depends if its overclocked. Willhub had a E6600 at 3.6 and a ATI 4870 and ran crysis at 27fps average on certain settings. He then got a E8500 i think running at 4GHZ+ and it boosted his average FPS to 32 at the same settings which is very good
 
Would see a small increasae but not a huge amount whatsoever. Will only notice when going to 4Ghz+ with the 8600
 
Well ive just replaced my rig with the one in the sig and i must say, its quite awesome and ive even noticed performance increases
 
Willhub had a E6600 at 3.6 and a ATI 4870 and ran crysis at 27fps average on certain settings. He then got a E8500 i think running at 4GHZ+ and it boosted his average FPS to 32 at the same settings which is very good
Click to expand...
Very good? Sounds a bit poop to me for what, 70 quid?

30 FPS is marginal playability though so I agree that around that range, small FPS boost can count for a lot.
 
my mates e8400 stock is a lot better than my e6600 at 3.15 but thats me
play WAR atm i get 35fps and he gets 60fps+ both with same gfx cards etc
 
3gig E8400 V 3.15gig E6600 is not going to show any noticeable difference in framerate ingames... if thats the only different factor...
 
DF1986 said:
I have a 2nd machine with an E6600 in it clocked to 3.6ghz on a Asus P5W DH Deluxe mobo and i was wondering, in % how much better is say a E8600 the new E0 stepping ?
Click to expand...

Depends what its used for. In games, it'd be nigh on identical, you wouldn't notice any difference unless you used FRAPs.
 
Does this not all depend more on having a decent gpu than the cpu that affects framerates more. As long as you have over 3ghz they should be nearly equal.
 
I'm contemplating replacing my e8400 @ 3.825ghz for an e6600 so long as it'll do 3.2ghz. I accidentally benched crysis at stock (3ghz instead of 3.825ghz) and got NO drop in the final score. So I tried a few times and still got no increase over running at a lower speed.
I don't use the pc for any apps that require a screamingly fast cpu, just the normal day to day stuff and gaming, so going by me findings, its not worth clocking over 3ghz-3.2ghz. I'm gonna try some other stuff to confirm this first though.:)
I just wonder if I still need the the high overclock to enable me to run me two 4870s in Xfire, I read somewhere that this was the case.
 
pieman109 said:
its not worth clocking over 3ghz-3.2ghz.
Click to expand...

I've posted links before showing C2D's cause Gpu bottleneck after 3ghz, even with a 4870x2 :)

If i was the op id just wait for nehalem tbh

lol @ Xez & Stoopidbaz (I see how he got the name now :p)
 
I've just been doing some benching to check me findings and I agree with "tatts" here. In crysis at any rate, there is NO difference in performance with the cpu at 3.2ghz or 3.825ghz, and thats powering 2 x 4870 cards in Xfire. What does make a helluva difference is if Xfire is disabled and running the game/benchy with just the one card, fps drop considerably. Means I'll keep both 4870s but flog me e8400 and get an e6600 that'll clock to 3.2ghz.:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom