• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia 280GTX

Associate
Joined
10 Sep 2008
Posts
145
Location
N. Ireland
Hey, thinking about getting the BFG GeForce GTX 280 OC 1GB GDDR3. How do you think this will handle the newest games eg crysis, on a system with
Intel Core2Quad Q6600 8MB 2.40Ghz 1066FSB SLACR
Corsair 4GB XMS2 DDR2 6400
Asus P5Q Deluxe Intel P45
Coolermaster Real Power 1000W Modular Silent
Thanks :D
 
lol yeah ok forgetting the overkilled psu (totally future proof :O), how will the gpu perform (ish)? :D
 
Last edited:
It will handle them well, it can handle Crysis "very high" settings at 1680*1050 with smooth gameplay, at 1920*1200 you will need to drop a few settings to maintain the same level of gameplay which is fairly easy in warhead, but in the original you will need a custom config to get the most out of it.
 
If thats the overclocked one don't bother paying extra, by a standard GTX280 (i got the leadteck one, you can get it on OCUK) and just downloaded Nvidia Tools from the Nvidia website, it unlocks the drivers performance tab which allows you to overclock the card.
I simply moved 3 sets of sliders to 700 core, 1250 memory, 1450 shader it ran a quick test said all was ok, i upped the fan speed from it's default 40% to 80% and hey presto job done, works fine on my games is stable and performs quicker than any of the overpriced pre-overclocked jobbies, and temperatrues are lower because the fan is at 80% rather than 40% which is to low even on a standard clocked card IMO, i got temps up to 75C in heavy games before i downloaded Nvidia Tools, and that was at stock speeds. Now it's overclocked with a faster fan speed i get around 55 when running under demanding games and around 30 odd in windows
 
Last edited:
If thats the overclocked one don't bother paying extra, by a standard GTX280 (i got the leadteck one, you can get it on OCUK) and just downloaded Nvidia Tools from the Nvidia website, it unlocks the drivers performance tab which allows you to overclock the card

I guarantee you, if I bought a 280GTX planning to overclock it rather than a 280GTX OC'd, I would get the one single card in the universe that refuses to overclock. :( :p My luck seems to have been that way for absolutely everything!
 
22" is not that tiny, I have that size screen myself and was torn between getting 22/24 and 26 inch sizes, the 26 was just the little kid in me saying yeah get that bad boy, it was to big for my desk and not practical

The serious choice came down to 22" or 24" both are nice sized screens, i went 22" in the end having checked out the sizes in shops i was happy with the screen area on a 22, it's all personal preference.

I too went the GTX280 route (overkill some may say) but what you can be certain of when PC gaming is you can never have to much power, while most games Crisis aside will be fine on most decent cards at that res the comming year will be bringing more and more graphically intense titles, that will see hardware pushed more and more.

The other thing to consider is real life performance vs reviews, while review sites show average game frame rates in the 100FPS marks that does not tell the whole story take the scores for Mass Effect here, which is a game i own
http://www.guru3d.com/article/evga-geforce-gtx-280-hc16-hydro-copper-review/10
Now that looks fine, but what it does not show you is the huge differances in framerates you get when playing the game, you might get 200 odd running down a featureless corridor and then 30 looking out over a massive vista, my experiance of ME on a 280 GTX overclocked is very good, with only minor frame rate stutters, even in more intensive scene's (like looking out longways over the length of the Citadel) frames stay above 30, with 60 + being the norm for most parts, now if i had a 9800 GTX i'm sure the game would still be very playable, but all the odd small stutters i get now when panning the camara would be larger and more noticable and looking out over the Citadel would probably result in noticable slowdowns with sub 30FPS drops in some sections, for me the main reason to get a top card, even though i game at 1680x1050 which is less taxing that higher resolutions was to get good minimum frame rates, so games run smooth on a consistant basis with less FPS dips to interupt the experiance
 
Back
Top Bottom