R U Sure? Best FPS from the Warhead benchmark on here for a 4870 is 28.5, and thats quite a heavily clocked quad and card.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Crysis Warhead -slightly jerky on HD4870-gamer settings
- Thread starter ferret face
- Start date
R U Sure? Best FPS from the Warhead benchmark on here for a 4870 is 28.5, and thats quite a heavily clocked quad and card.
Nonsense. I play at above 19" with an old GPU and it's perfectly playable. So do many others.
I have 4gb ram. you really do need 4gig for this game me thinks. btw, try directx 9 mode. It seems to use less ram. But dude, ram is so cheap these days and going foward, you really do need 4 gig
If on Vista 32then that's not really enough since the OS is going to be using almost 2GB RAM normally and Crysis/Warhead both use beyond 1.5GB RAM as you get into the game with Gamer/High settings.
I get 25-30fps 1920x1080 Enthusiast settings on a 4870 and 8GB ram
its is not even a year old you baboon11 december 2007
err. I was not referring to that you "baboon"! its based on technology that is 2 years+ old. 8800's have been around since 2006. So yeah I am correct in what I am saying. Your card is just a rehash of that tech. Not saying its a bad card. It just cant run Crysis like the 4870 can, at least your one cant obviously.
If the game runs like ****, its coz of your system, not the game. As it runs sweet on mine. So go spread your lies elsewhere. Its a demanding game and that's the end of it.
I have Vista 64bit
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 2,371
- Location
- Cardiff
Hummuh maybe flinco means it hits the max of 35 fps which a 4870 would easily do.
Maybe he has got a good clocking 4870. But without details of what res he plays at it difficult to verify. To be honest I doubt he could improve on the FPS in the database without a patch for crysis warhead or a driver release from ATI as the ati users results are all in a few FPS of each other.
Maybe he has got a good clocking 4870. But without details of what res he plays at it difficult to verify. To be honest I doubt he could improve on the FPS in the database without a patch for crysis warhead or a driver release from ATI as the ati users results are all in a few FPS of each other.
You will get a nice boost. Make sure you run it on direct x 9 mode if you want the extra fps. I get like 8fps extra by using dx9 and the only difference is lighting. dx10 the sun is brighter, and so is objects. No big deal though. I prefer the extra 8fps as it means no lag when fighting with lots of Koreans/ ice level.
With dx10 I got some lag on ice levels mainly, so I switched to gamer setting and lag was gone. But I prefer dx9 mode and enthusiast setting instead. Also just sold my 4870 512mb version and paying extra £30 to go for the 1gig version @ my resolution it will help and more future proof also.
Anyway, I apologise for being a bit rude with you, just the things you were saying did not represent everyone, but just yourself and you made it sound like its like that for everyone. Have fun