Carrick is more attacking than Scholes these days
No he's not. Scholes doesn't roam forward, but he's the one that's given the job of wandering. Carrick is clearly told to sit behind him, collect the ball and play it to the wide-men.
Carrick is more attacking than Scholes these days
And who can argue with the greatest player that's ever lived
Abuse from his staggering, what more can I do other than ignore him. Leave the forum?
I honestly think Liverpools midfield is better. Trying to give an neutral opinion is hard but I think its true;
Babel / Masc / Gerrard / Riera
Subs; Alonso, Lucas.
I would only swop Ronaldo.
No he's not. Scholes doesn't roam forward, but he's the one that's given the job of wandering. Carrick is clearly told to sit behind him, collect the ball and play it to the wide-men.
Even as a Liverpool fan I'm going to have to disagree!
Though not given enough games from what I've seen of Babel he's got a long way to come. So many times he'll burn it down the wing then completely fail to get round the right back, plus he can almost be guaranteed to cut inside.
I'm happy to proved wrong this season, but at this point I'm going to have to concede to utd.
Finally a bit of SenseEven as a Liverpool fan I'm going to have to disagree!
Though not given enough games from what I've seen of Babel he's got a long way to come. So many times he'll burn it down the wing then completely fail to get round the right back, plus he can almost be guaranteed to cut inside.
I'm happy to proved wrong this season, but at this point I'm going to have to concede to utd.
If you really want to push it the best you could say that they both defend just as much as they attack but even then you'd be wrong
How you can say Scholes is the defender whilst Carrick is the attacker makes me wonder if you watch Man Utd.
Like wise, but then again it took you a year after everyone else before you admitted that you were wrong about Evra as well so....