ummmm because SAF didnt try and buy him ...... (after all Man Utd try and buy the best available whether we have similar players or not)
Judging by someof the lemons he has bought, thats not strictly true.
ummmm because SAF didnt try and buy him ...... (after all Man Utd try and buy the best available whether we have similar players or not)
lol... no, we've bought a LOT of rubbish. Hell, we went for Veron over Vieira.ummmm because SAF didnt try and buy him ...... (after all Man Utd try and buy the best available whether we have similar players or not)
I wouldn't say so, I think he delivers a better ball from the right.He has been even less impressive on the RW when him and R have swapped wings mid-game etc
Are you purposefully being stupid? You know as well as I do that any past player would have been much more costly than when we actually bought them - for instance the £19m we paid for RVN would easily be £25m-£30m now adays, and the price paid for Cantona would be nearer 10-15 times what we paid (given that even moderate players get transfered for that amount)
I've not twisted your words at all. You're reasoning for Berbatov being a better player than Young was simply because Utd didn't bid for him. By that reasoning Berbatov's the best striker in the world.
They were never going to be the same kind of player anyway - without even considering how many times Viera had mucked Utd aroundlol... no, we've bought a LOT of rubbish. Hell, we went for Veron over Vieira..
Also, I mentioned our greatest strikeforce ever which was undoubtedly '99 and Cantona wasn't a part of that.
You keep making such bold comments in reply but seem to get plenty of facts wrong time and time again.
Looking at it from a playing perspective - blast it the striker's name has slippped my mind - South American with long curly hair at best an average premiership striker moved to spain (Villareal?) three seasons ago and was top striker in his first season - and he was given enough chances by SAF and never showed anything like that ability/quality
"He just is" - Phenomenal reasoning.
I could give you 20 reasons why Young is better than Berbatov, I could also give you 20 reasons why Berbatov is better than Young, but to say Berbatov is better "because he just is", is absolutely ludicrous.
my reasoning is that berbatov is better than young because he just is. not saying that young is a bad player either.
Wait wait wait.
Are people actually trying to say that Ferguson has never signed a bad player?
Wait wait wait.
Are people actually trying to say that Ferguson has never signed a bad player?
no but over a period of time i'd wager his record is up there with at the top level. he's signed some duds. but apart from a dodgy period a few years back overall it's been very strong.
it really isn't, you can easily say that some players just are better than others. you've simply got your bee in your bonnet about berbatov and seem inclined not to give him a fair chance.