/rant
5/10
/rant
Jeezz. Most FWD cars understeer, I totally agree. What I'm saying is that its not specifically designed that way, its a by-products of the cheaper cost of producing a front engined, FWD car. Its been made out to be some master plan when in reality its just how FWD cars are.
5/10
I take it you dont really have an understanding of how suspension geometry effects handling, and can be used to induce a bias towards over and understeer, in any car, be it FWD, RWD or AWD
Its not a master plan, its just basic safety. The suspension geometry of the vast majority of production cars is set to be biased towards understeer, because its safer for the average man on the street.
You only have to look at places like the Porsche forum on Pistonheads to see examples of this, many enthusiasts take their cars to get the factory alignment settings changed to make the handling more neutral, and dial out the inherent understeer in the factory alignment settings.
Its also well known in MR2 circles that the factory alignment setting were altered between the rev1/2 and rev3. The earlier models were more prone to oversteer, which gave them something of a widowmaker reputation. Toyota altered the geo settings in the later models to rectify this.
Some say, he likes to talk rubbish....and that he in fact tells other people they're talking rubbish....
All we know is, he's called .....
Anyway, I'm sure as an experienced 20 year old driver you've have way more real world and track time knowledge than me![]()
See i thought this too. That's why i said "But if i'm wrong, please by all means correct me! We're all here to learn!", but then you said stuff which just clearly wasn't true in any way, shape or form, so i set about finding a video of an experienced racing driver to prove you wrong too and i did (the Tiff video).
You've not really used main stream production cars in your examples. Does this apply to Mondeo's, Astra, 3 Series BMW's etc or does this just apply to cars that help prove your point?
The chassis has been designed to give the new Mondeo wagon a 'no surprises' neutral to slightly understeering characteristic, providing the driver with continuous feedback if the vehicle is approaching its limits of adhesion. There should be no sudden excessive moments of understeer that surprise the driver.
Suspension Geometry is suspension geometry, sure different chassis will respond to changes differently than others, but overall the concept is the same.
After a few minutes with the guru of google:-
http://www.autoworld.com/apps/news/FullStory.asp?id=205
So in this case the chassis and suspension have been designed to be more neutral, but still on the understeering side of neutral.
I'm sure I could find more examples given time of how the handling characteristics of production cars are set conservatively to make them more accesible to the average driver![]()
What exactly have I posted that wasnt 'true in an way shape or form'?
If you lift of you 99% of the time wont get the back end out without some help (usually the hand brake) and the slide wont 'evaporate' when you touch the power. Power can be used to keep the back end out.
The Tiff video shows how to get the back end out on a FWD car. Exellent, but its not a powerslide, which you said a FWD car can do, in your first post.
How did it proce ALL of what I've said is wrong?
... Are you delibarately trying to misunderstand my posts?I don't lose the back end on 99% of the roundabouts i take during a day of driving. I was saying that when i WANT the backend to step out, lifting off, coupled with a bit of speed will give me oversteer, that
will pretty much disappear if i put my foot down again.
.
I don't know how i can make it more clear, but if there is anything else you don't understand, i'll try and explain it as best i can. Maybe the Tiff video i posted will aid your understanding of the subject further.
.
Well, i think i've proved they are and can only imagine you're bored and just want to argue over....pretty much nothing?
.
In English please?
.
*hits head against wall* ok. Maybe it's my fault that i didn't write a 3 page reply stating that it doesn't matter HOW you unsettle the car, it's the unsettling which is important in 4WD and FWD cars. I just assumed it was a given that you needed to upset the car's balance to promote a slide.
.
Again, rubbish. For someone who's accusing other people of not being factual, you're doing a good job on the ironing. Again, Source: Tiff Needell video
.
?? I suspect this is absolute rubbish too, on anything but a strangely set up car, such as the one clarkey posted earlier, but hitting the throttle whilst getting the backend out in a FWD car will cause it to straighten up - or cause the slide to "evaporate", which, guess what, i said in my first post.
Again, Source: Tiff Needell video.
How are you not getting this?
We've already established that i said that with an undertone of sarcastic jest - more specifically "and there you'll have you very own little powerslide". And i also clarified other points you seemed to have misunderstood.
I never said it proved that everything you've said in this thread is rubbish!! I said it proves everything you said about the FWD oversteer was wrong! Which it was!
Anyway, i've got work to do now! Can't throw away a degree arguing over the internet with you about powerslides!![]()
Orange Peel said:If you lift of you 99% of the time wont get the back end out without some help (usually the hand brake)
Rubbish. Turning the steering wheel is enough. Source: Tiff Needell video
Tiff said:"So to get it sideways without using the handbrake you need to resort to the Scandinavian flick followed by a bit of lift off over steer
I've never personally had a problem inducing lift off oversteer on any car, certainly never needed the handbrake! You do need to be reasonably aggressive though.
Stand by them all you want matey. It doesn't change the fact the FWD cars are not 'designed' to understeer as you believe.