I've always classed them as a small club. All through the 80's like chelsea and westham they got relegated then came back up again. They had a small spell in the 90's when they had more money to spend but even then no one feared playing them. The defense was so laughable you always fancied your chances.
As someone showed you hardly had any fans going to games in the early 80's.
Hardly any fans went to football matches in the 80s, it was a bad time for attendances.
Man United v Wimbledon
Division One 02/05/1989
Attendance: 23,368
Where'd the 52,000 new fans come from?
As for a laughable defence, Newcastle conceded 2 more goals than Man U in the 95/96 season, was Man U's defence laughable?
After a turbulent period, you hired a no-nonsense manager who could have steadied the ship, but chucked him out because you weren't willing to sacrifice the good football you stopped playing well a decade before, in order to win games. You brought back an old manager with a questionable temperament, and then were surprised when he got the strop and left. You loathe a chairman who's done nothing but pump money into your club and help it continue, even after you started baying for his blood, and still does even now its apparent no-one else will buy you.
Why do you say 'you' as if the fans choose to sack Allardyce and bring in Keegan, a few fans were vocal about Allardyce in games, but no-one suggested bringing Keegan back. Anyway I think the fans who wanted Allardyce out were more concerned with not being able to beat Derby rather than the style of football.
I don't really know anyone who was surprised when Keegan left, but I don't think anyone would blame him, no-one blamed Curbishley after all.
Everything you've said is basically conjecture.
Last edited: