Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
Don't they have a good "takedown" policy? i.e. they take down torrents (without question) if the copyright owner requests removal.
the source are the groups like deviant , razor1911 , reloaded , lol , or whoever is around these days.They are not the source though; the pirate bay stores no copyrighted content on it's servers. The source are the people who seed those torrent files.
All they can be tried on is "making available" which has been a very grey area in past cases.
Don't they have a good "takedown" policy? i.e. they take down torrents (without question) if the copyright owner requests removal.
Not really, there are providing an area to store and track .torrent files. These .torrent files contain no illegal information.
95% + of which link to copyright material, they are facilitating the download of copyright material, make no effort to remove the links to copyright material etc etc etc the practice of this and other such sights is morally wrong just because the law doesn't currently prohibit there activities or regulate them doesn't make there actions right.
A good take down policy would be pro-active, if over 95% of the stuff on there site is links to downloads of copyright material I would hardly say they have a good take down policy! It's just a piece of paper to hide behind and it is clearly ineffective.
95% + of which link to copyright material, they are facilitating the download of copyright material, make no effort to remove the links to copyright material etc etc etc the practice of this and other such sights is morally wrong just because the law doesn't currently prohibit there activities or regulate them doesn't make there actions right.
A good take down policy would be pro-active, if over 95% of the stuff on there site is links to downloads of copyright material I would hardly say they have a good take down policy! It's just a piece of paper to hide behind and it is clearly ineffective.
Hahah AXXO the Legend!!!
He must have supplied over 500+ Movies.
The way the charges have been dropped left right and center shows in a harsh light the utter ignorance, incompetence and ineptness of the people trying to go after the filesharers. They have no clue what's going on whatsoever, nor even the slightest idea of how the whole thing works. They didn't even realize that Pirate Bay doesn't even actually host any content or copyrighted works until halfway into this sorry state of a trial. This is why I think they will fail abysmally, and walk away with their tails between their legs feeling sorry for themselves.
Instead of fighting the system, they should take advantage of it. Current legal distribution methods are woefully poor and inadequate, and they are absolutely not budging from it.
They would save so much. I actually find it staggering that all these companies with their 'MUST-SAVE-MONEY' ethos and profit-grabbing greed, they don't even look into digital distribution, which eliminates the need for a third party publisher, or the manufacturing of physical goods and so on. It costs practically nothing to lug music or films over the internet with sensible file rights management, compared to having to print dvds and send them off to be sold and all that jazz.
Look at Valve. PC gaming is 'dead' but these guys are laughing all the way to the bank thanks to their digital distribution platform.
Instead of fighting the system, they should take advantage of it. Current legal distribution methods are woefully poor and inadequate, and they are absolutely not budging from it.
I don't know. If you put 4.5GB of data up for direct distribution then you'll be pushing some SERIOUS bandwidth for a relatively popular title.
Seems the problem in the future may not be downloading from these sources, even if all major companies in music/film/tv/games embrace torrents the problem will come from ISP's limiting bandwidth.