A police officer is being investigated after allegedly writing on a website that he was keen to "bash some long haired hippys" at the G20 protest.
Pc Rob Ward apparently put the note on Facebook on the evening of 1 April, the first day of City of London protests.
A Scotland Yard spokeswoman said: "The matter has been recorded and will be investigated appropriately."
Well, that certainly gives us a few clues about the motivation of our noble constabulary.
No it doesn't.
I gives a clue on how much of a tit a serving officer is if he posts such things on a public website.
It does not reflect on the entire constabulary except in the eyes of the blinkered.
soapboxstuart said:
Oh dear.
You know in a strange sort of way I'm starting to feel sorry for the posters who have backed the police actions on this thread.
EVERY day they have had to deal with something new that diminishes the strength of their argument.
I look forward to the inevitably robust arguments in favour of this latest disaster.
Clearly there are Police officers that went to the G20 with an agenda.
It is highly unfortunate that a man has died as a result.
And it is also highly unforunate that you do not look at both sides of the fence when it comes to public order policing in the UK.
EVERY day, the strength of any police argument is diminished by the completely one sided footage, reporting and bias that we have seen in the media. Are you happy with the reporting standards that show the side you want to believe or do you think that there is another side to events ?
Most police officers went to G20 with the agenda of doing what they were told, namely preventing London from desending into chaos from a select few who went there with the sole intention of causing said chaos.
There is a complaints procedure in place for those who feel they have been treated unfairly, disrespectfully or manhandled and over 140 complaints are being looked at now.
Should the PC have posted a comment like that on Facebook then he frankly deserves to be hauled over the coals.
Might I suggest you refrain from generalisation ? It is untrue to label all officers for the actions of a few, not to mention offensive. With respect, you don't have much of a clue of what frontline police officers face on a daily basis where countless acts of selfless bravery prevent people from meeting their maker. Good news is no news though eh ?