Sorry, I don't get your point here? I wasn't talking about 50 years ago, I was talking about the modern game. Where quite frankly Liverpool are a long way behind Chelsea, Arsenal, and Utd. Frankly, since the Premier League formed Liverpool have been a second rate team.
When you talk about success you don't just talk about recent trophies, fact Liverpool are the most successful English football club. Get over it.
Sorry they don't have a good squad on paper? When gerrard decides to play fairly he can be one of the best in the world. And did they not buy Torres, who happened to be one of the most in form strikers?
Two players don't make a team, I've never said Gerrard isn't a good player, and I didn't mention Torres. Torres is a very good striker and was a good buy. Mash is a good defensive midfielder as is Alonso.
Why is "recent history" not important? Surely that is their current form? Notts Forest won in Europe in 1980. Does that mean they are better than Man Utd now then? Obviously you are right. Liverpool won everything 50 years ago so they must be the best team now as well.
Why does past glory not count ? Liverpool are the most succesful English side. Manchester United are enjoying a lot of current success. In a few seasons, maybe next season they'll have passed Liverpool's trophie haul.
Didn't argue this? Again History, nice in a trophy cabinet but doesn't win games in 2009 does it?
No, but it means they've got a lot of history, history which defines the club. Chelsea have a fairly small recent amount of success. Arsenal having being a succesful club. I'm sorry but do you not count Liverpool as a good club because they "won a few things ages ago, and finished second this season"
LOL. Yes Wenger used to be as arrogant as hell partly for being a ***** and partly because he was sort of entitled to seeing as Arsenal raped everyone at one stage. But he has learned from his mistakes and he is one of the most respectable managers now and will always congratulate the other team and accept defeat (just like Fergie, Mourinho, Hiddink, ...)
Benitez not arrogant? Won't even bother with that one.
Wenger is still arrogant, Being arrogant doesn't make you respected, even if you act a bit of a "*****" in an interview, it doesn't make what you've achieved on the field any less so.
Benitez doesn't like losing, Fergie, Wenger, Mourinho don't like losing, and they've all taken it badly before.
Yes. 90% footballers dive. It is getting ridiculous. Drogba looks like a complete idiot half the time when he towers over most other players and still manages to hit the deck. But he doesnt fall over for no reason. He makes the most of being pushed about when really he should be smacking them back and getting on with it. Gerrard trips over thin air. Just youtube it before you argue.
I'm sorry. Gerrard
dives as do the majority of footballers in the top league. I'm sorry again, is Gerrard some how the "worst" because he's English ? or plays for Liverpool ? ... All players dive, doesn't matter how or where they do it, a dive is a dive.
Maybe. But to be honest I think the 4th contender is more likely to be Man City after a £500m spending spree or Harry Houdini's revamped Spurs.
Manchester City have the most money and as such are the most likely to pose the biggest threat ? Everton have at least once cracked the "top four" which shows that it's not all about money.
Arsenal, if they get things right could dominate English football for years to come with the very young squad they have, Manchester United are building for the future and Liverpool will still be knocking about, as will Chelsea. You can't just dissmiss them all now. Aston Villa might improve and start to steal a top four place, Everton could.