The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.

moremoney said:
Why don't you people with crap opinions, listen to Simon Darby the Deputy of the BNP, and then post you're crap.
He is on an internet radio station.
Click to expand...

Maybe he speaks well. But he's still a fascist.

You have posted what you claim to be the BNP's position, but which is directly contradicted by the BNP's own literature. You keep moving the goalposts with this native/citizen/resident/whatever malarky, resisting any attempt to nail down what any of those terms mean to the BNP.

I'm unsure as to whether you support what the BNP actually is and are following the party policy of lying to conceal it or if you're a useful idiot for the BNP, taken in by their facade.

Simple question:

How far back in time does a person have to be able to trace their entire family tree within Britain in order for you to think it isn't a good idea to strongly "encourage" them to leave the country?

Remember that official BNP policy is that you should conceal the fact that BNP policy on this matter is actually about skin colour.
 
Pestilence said:
Listening to a bigot bang on about whatever they hate this week and spouting "I agree!" is hardly "first hand knowledge" of an argument.

As others in this thread have said, there is no such thing as "indiginous British" people. This whole island is populated by immigrants from other lands - half breeds, mulattos, mongrels, whatever way you want to put it that's what all British people are. There are no "pure bloods".

From what I can remember, the origin of the human species was traced back to Kenya (or the "Cradle of Life" as it's regarded). Since we all spread out and evolved from there, should everyone in Britain be "repatriated" to somewhere else? How would the destination be chosen? A lottery?

If your party wants to pay people to move abroad, by all means I'll take whatever state help I can get to bounce off to Aus or Canada, and I'm white.
Click to expand...

If you are saying MY party, then i am sorry to say you are wrong, all i am saying is they have a right to be heard.

Are you saying everyone is so gullible that they will be influenced by the boogyman.
 
Just spent five minutes watching: http://bnp.org.uk/live-tv/

A racist white South African ranting about how white's deserve to be in power? I've never been so shocked. Can't wait for him to get kicked out when the BNP come to power, with him being foreign and all. Oh sorry, he won't - he's white.
 
I got a BNP leaflet through my door today. I intercepted the poster and handed back the leaflet informing him that as I was the descendent of a Catholic Irish immigrant he might not want my support. Cue hysterics and a rendition of the Rangers fans favourite - The Famine Song. Not exactly working hard to disuade me from voting for anyone else eh?
 
moremoney said:
Well i think you ouht to back to school because we are a race of Pagans. First ruled buy Queen Boudecia (who has Icelandic ancestory) Who then challenged the Romans.
Click to expand...

I think you need to find a school, because what you have just stated is (a) wrong and (b) shows a very poor grasp of English.

Boudicca (note that you couldn't even get her name right) was queen of one tribe. Only one tribe, the tribe that the Romans called Icenii. Maybe that's what they called themselves, maybe not. The great majority of Britons were not of the Icenii tribe and so were not ruled by Boudicca. Icelandic ancestry...I've not heard that before, though it's possible. She was on the eastern side of the country. Boudicca didn't really challenge the Romans. She just led a horde that slaughtered civilians and burned things.

"Pagan" is a religious term, so you are now saying that religion is race. How far do you go with that? For example, do you see Catholics and Protestants as being different races, or do you see them as being the same race?

You're using poor English to talk rubbish and you think I should go back to school. That's amusing.

EDIT: Also, modern humans were in Britain at least 30,000 years before Boudicca. So why on Earth do you think Boudicca has any relevance to the first modern humans in Britain?
 
slylittlefox said:
Just spent five minutes watching: http://bnp.org.uk/live-tv/

A racist white South African ranting about how white's deserve to be in power? I've never been so shocked. Can't wait for him to get kicked out when the BNP come to power, with him being foreign and all. Oh sorry, he won't - he's white.
Click to expand...

Well if you think we are all the same, that is you're biggest failling.

And what happened in SA is the worlds biggest faliure ever. the torture and violence is horrific

I can't even watch ****e like this.
 
Angilion said:
I think you need to find a school, because what you have just stated is (a) wrong and (b) shows a very poor grasp of English.

Boudicca (note that you couldn't even get her name right) was queen of one tribe. Only one tribe, the tribe that the Romans called Icenii. Maybe that's what they called themselves, maybe not. The great majority of Britons were not of the Icenii tribe and so were not ruled by Boudicca. Icelandic ancestry...I've not heard that before, though it's possible. She was on the eastern side of the country. Boudicca didn't really challenge the Romans. She just led a horde that slaughtered civilians and burned things.

"Pagan" is a religious term, so you are now saying that religion is race. How far do you go with that? For example, do you see Catholics and Protestants as being different races, or do you see them as being the same race?

You're using poor English to talk rubbish and you think I should go back to school. That's amusing.

EDIT: Also, modern humans were in Britain at least 30,000 years before Boudicca. So why on Earth do you think Boudicca has any relevance to the first modern humans in Britain?
Click to expand...

I am sorry to say this but we are a white nation "Origionaly" then?.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom