The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.
- Thread starter Stolly
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2008
- Posts
- 11,114
Anyone else feel like this might be just as fruitful as arguing with a religious fanatic?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/a-right-menace-nick-griffin-1689784.html
this makes interesting reading, heres a section of the article. Griffin is a flipflopper who will jump on any bandwagon to "gain popularity".
When Griffin was 15, his father Edgar took his son to his first National Front meeting. When he went up to Cambridge in 1977 to read history and law at Downing College, he founded the university's Young National Front Students group and soon rose through the ranks of the neo-fascist party. Within a year he had become national organiser.
But the National Front fell apart a decade later. Griffin was a key figure in the foundation of one of its successor factions, the International Third Position (ITP), advocating a blood-and-soil alternative to communism and capitalism. In it he praised the black separatist Louis Farrakhan, met David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, travelled to Libya at the expense of Colonel Gaddafi and expressed support for Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini – who also had a strong dislike of Jews, women's rights, homosexuals, liberal democracy, international capitalism, Coca-Cola and McDonald's.
this makes interesting reading, heres a section of the article. Griffin is a flipflopper who will jump on any bandwagon to "gain popularity".
When Griffin was 15, his father Edgar took his son to his first National Front meeting. When he went up to Cambridge in 1977 to read history and law at Downing College, he founded the university's Young National Front Students group and soon rose through the ranks of the neo-fascist party. Within a year he had become national organiser.
But the National Front fell apart a decade later. Griffin was a key figure in the foundation of one of its successor factions, the International Third Position (ITP), advocating a blood-and-soil alternative to communism and capitalism. In it he praised the black separatist Louis Farrakhan, met David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, travelled to Libya at the expense of Colonel Gaddafi and expressed support for Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini – who also had a strong dislike of Jews, women's rights, homosexuals, liberal democracy, international capitalism, Coca-Cola and McDonald's.
Do you have to hotlink??
Unbelievable.And very ironic that you make a derogatory point of his personal appearance and then call him a bigot.. epic fail..? LOL.
Last edited:
So, you finally admit it's all about a ridiculously inaccurate description of skin colour.
And therefore stupid, silly, irrational and pathetic.
"we" aren't any of the original nations anyway, so how could they be relevant?
Or are you ignoring everything prior to the Act of Union 1707, which unified Great Britain into a nation for the first time? That wouldn't make any sense, but I don't expect sense from a BNP supporter.
Our nation is many colours - green grass, blue lakes, brown soil, black soil, gray rocks, red flowers, etc, etc.
As for the first modern humans here, who knows what colour their skin was? Why care, anyway?
When you said tomorrow, did you mean after you'd slept, or on Monday? Either way, are you going to answer the questions now?
What defines who should be allowed to live in Britain?
I wonder, if we had another WWII and the GOV called up people to fight
would the immigrants that are in the UK go and fight and kill the people even if it means it was thier fathers birth(religious) land.
Or have we got a army of (religious)immigrants already here just waiting for the kick off.
And over come us from the inside?
would the immigrants that are in the UK go and fight and kill the people even if it means it was thier fathers birth(religious) land.
Or have we got a army of (religious)immigrants already here just waiting for the kick off.
And over come us from the inside?
We already have Muslims in the army, fighting for us in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
I dont mean a few I mean like a call up like they did in WWII
everyone who can fight.
EDIT=Against the whole counrty, everyone living there like WWII.
Last edited:
Like the polish chap in the spitfire on the BNP flyer? What about the Ghurkas?
On a more serious note, how many objections do you think there would be from the general public (irrespective of race) would there be if you tried to reintroduce conscription? What makes you think the risk is in any way concievable enough to be worth considering? And why are you convinced that the war, in the highly unlikely event it occured, would be against the middle east (because that's the primary source of non-christian immigrants)?
Last edited:
I think a war could break out in the middle east because they have the oil.
And as for conscription if your country needs you you should be already lined up to fight
Dont wait to be asked or forced. And I am glad that all our grandfathers NEVER thought like you.
They went to war lined up to sign before conscription came in.
If I remember rightly in the falklands wars the armys phone lines was was full of
people asking CAN I HELP MY COUNTRY.
And as for conscription if your country needs you you should be already lined up to fight
Dont wait to be asked or forced. And I am glad that all our grandfathers NEVER thought like you.
They went to war lined up to sign before conscription came in.
If I remember rightly in the falklands wars the armys phone lines was was full of
people asking CAN I HELP MY COUNTRY.
That doesn't answer my question. How many people, say aged 16-40, do you think would be happy and welcome to be called up now?
This might change if there was a defined enemy and a clear risk/reason, but as we don't have any such situation at the moment, this speculation is pointless.
It would be just my luck for there to be a call up between those ages Dolph, Personally I would borrow my little brothers birth certificate & sign up the First day they asked, I say that Hand of Heart.
My Grandad fought & I would Honour his memory & Honour myself & my family at the same time.
My Grandad fought & I would Honour his memory & Honour myself & my family at the same time.
As for the Politics, I am ****** at the mo, I can't believe they are getting away with Fraud. 
I cannot bring myself to vote for either party but must cast a vote to give my voice.
The open chat here helps though.
Wrong thread really but I'm sure you know what I mean.
I cannot bring myself to vote for either party but must cast a vote to give my voice.
The open chat here helps though.
Wrong thread really but I'm sure you know what I mean.
Well if you dont like my answer what can I do?
Hello so you think Osama bin Laden and his merry (deranged) men are not a risk/reason?
clear and present danger comes to mind.
anyway back to the topic in hand.
The Archbishops of Canterbury and York have urged voters not to let anger over
the expenses scandal drive them to vote for the BNP in next month's elections.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8065583.stm
So now the bully boys start omg.
the expenses scandal drive them to vote for the BNP in next month's elections.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8065583.stm
So now the bully boys start omg.
Yep, they're not threat to us.
Why? Do you think they will invade the UK?
I don't see any bully boys, except the BNP. Sounds like the Archbishops are giving perfectly sensible advice.
Last edited: