Homeopathy

i've mentioned the other possible mechanism of action, which definately seems more plausible - to me anyway.

Unfortunately, the "low level pathogen" suggestion doesn't fly either. The OP was complaining of hayfever. As far as I remember that's caused by a certain type of antibody (IgE) binding the pollen and causing some cells of your immune system to activate and release inflammatory mediators and histamines (that's what hayfever treatments contain anti-histamines). If you just introduce more of the pollen then you'll get more of a reaction. If you give them something that is different but gives the same symptoms it'll....give the same symptoms. Assuming it hasn't been diluted out.
 
Yes, this is true, but that is one of the "possible" mechanisms of action, and i agree that the principle of this imprinted water is very sketchy

i've mentioned the other possible mechanism of action, which definately seems more plausible - to me anyway.

take a look at this link if you want:

http://www.kulisz.com/how_does_homeopathy_work.htm

That doesn't overcome the fact that the recommended dose levels mean it's unlikely that any active ingrdient will be present. We also have the question of what represents a similar action to what youare trying to cure. Given the lack of medical training and study the best you can be talking about is at an observed symptomatic level.
 
Yes, this is true, but that is one of the "possible" mechanisms of action, and i agree that the principle of this imprinted water is very sketchy

i've mentioned the other possible mechanism of action, which definately seems more plausible - to me anyway.

take a look at this link if you want:

http://www.kulisz.com/how_does_homeopathy_work.htm

The simple fact is that under controlled studies homeopathy does not work, there's no point discussing proposed mechanisms when the efficacy of the whole thing is unproven.
 
There are many prescribed homeopathic treatments that are very successful and have strong scientific backing.

This is completely untrue. There is not a single homeopathic treatment with scientific backing.

The problem with many illnesses is that the number of pathogens/"foreign objects" is not great enough to warrant the body's immune system to react significiantly, meaning the disease shall remain. Homeopathic medicines introduce chemicals which have similar propertes to those of the pathogens that cause the disease. The increase in number means that the immune system reacts more violently to the disease and it is soon treated; hence why these treatments "help the body's natural healing".

This is nonsense.

Firstly, your idea about how the immune system works is completely untrue.

Secondly, homeopathic remedies don't contain anything. They're dilluted so much that there's a single molecule of what they purportedly contain in there - if there's not enough in your body for it to react to there sure as heck isn't enough in the overpriced water the homeopath is selling you.
 
Unfortunately, the "low level pathogen" suggestion doesn't fly either. The OP was complaining of hayfever. As far as I remember that's caused by a certain type of antibody (IgE) binding the pollen and causing some cells of your immune system to activate and release inflammatory mediators and histamines (that's what hayfever treatments contain anti-histamines). If you just introduce more of the pollen then you'll get more of a reaction. If you give them something that is different but gives the same symptoms it'll....give the same symptoms. Assuming it hasn't been diluted out.

This is true as well, i didnt say this would work for hayfever, becuase seen as the symptoms are created by the body practically "over reacting" to the pollen the introduction of even more pathogens wouldnt help. This sort of treatment isn't a "cure all" solution, but it has a place for treating small conditions such as viral infections, stress related issues and skin problems
 
Firstly, your idea about how the immune system works is completely untrue.

i honestly dont see why :p please explain then, in all honesty im by no means a biologist but i was under the impression the whole reason a body reacts to an illness and creates antibodies is due to a significant level of viruses etc that are present
 
the whole reason a body reacts to an illness and creates antibodies is due to a significant level of viruses etc that are present

You only need one T-cell activated by one virus particle to start off the adaptive immune system, and pretty much the same for the innate. The reason a lot of viral infections stick around is because they either infect somewhere the immune system won't touch for fear of causing too much damage (like nerves) or they actively suppress the immune system. It's not really about not having enough of the virus particles.
 
I don't have any scientific backing for it working, but do have some personal experience.

When I was a kid, I used to get mouth ulcers very very frequently and they would stay for weeks. My grandfather then recommended some homepathic medicines for me (after reading up etc a lot on the topic. I was small, so i just remember him having books about it in his hands) and I started taking them. Started off with the effect of them disappearing within a week rather than multiple weeks and after a while, they just stopped coming.

So in my opinion, they did work, at least for that. Never tried it for other things because convential medicine did the job in those cases (but not in this) so I can't say about them, but it was effective in this regard.
 
You only need one T-cell activated by one virus particle to start off the adaptive immune system, and pretty much the same for the innate. The reason a lot of viral infections stick around is because they either infect somewhere the immune system won't touch for fear of causing too much damage (like nerves) or they actively suppress the immune system. It's not really about not having enough of the virus particles.

ok then, i stand corrected :p

with regards to the scientific studies i have to admit although there are many flying references and numbers i've had trouble finding the actual papers, heres something though:

http://www.lifeforce.in/app/casestudies_warts.asp

http://www.geocities.com/indianhomeopath/cases.html

i'm under prescription myself though and receive the tablets tomorrow, so they better work :p
 
I was hoping for something more than single case observational studies; these are what started off the MMR scare. How about something published in a medical journal, including methodology.
 
Last edited:
Everyone should be issued with a mandatory copy of Bad Science by Ben Goldacre.

It doesn't work - any positive results will be placebo or regression to the mean.
 
have a read how its supposed to work - its total crap and anyone that believes it needs their head testing.

p.s. i bet magick believes it ;)
 
Everyone should be issued with a mandatory copy of Bad Science by Ben Goldacre.

It doesn't work - any positive results will be placebo or regression to the mean.

I think I mention that book every 5th post :D

Homeopathy for hayfever. LOL.

Using homeopathic theory, tapwater should be the most potent thing to man (remember, these buffoons actually think that diluting something makes it MORE potent).

ok then, i stand corrected

with regards to the scientific studies i have to admit although there are many flying references and numbers i've had trouble finding the actual papers, heres something though:

It's all bobbins. Seriously, there's nothing out there. After 200 years, homeopathy has never cured anything and has only worked as a placebo. If it did work, it would be part of mainstream medicine, and "big pharma" would have be making 10s of millions a year out of homeopathy, rather than Biorin.

For anyone interested in conspiracy theories who might buy into this homeopathy stuff - look into Biorin. Then tell me that it's "Big Pharma" who are trying to con us.
 
I remember as a kid I had a wart on my hand. Over time it just got smaller and smaller and eventually dissapeared.

...must have been all the tap water I was drinking!
 
It's the kind of thing my mum believes in. She's currently doing a course of 'magnetic' therapy to help her arthritis, as well as seeing a 'healer' (i.e. charlatan). She swears it makes a difference after every visit, oh well :/ Never underestimate the power of the imagination.
 
For anyone interested in conspiracy theories who might buy into this homeopathy stuff - look into Boiron. Then tell me that it's "Big Pharma" who are trying to con us.
Corrected the spelling, but you're right, they make €313 million a year selling products based on quack medicine. Their profit margins must be incredible being as they don't have to do all those awkward trials.
 
Corrected the spelling, but you're right, they make €313 million a year selling products based on quack medicine. Their profit margins must be incredible being as they don't have to do all those awkward trials.

Apologies for the spelling! I was surprised that they actually do bother going through all the vigorous rituals, they have machines that slap the test tube against a leather cushion and everything.

I wonder how many homeopaths really believe in what they are preaching...
 
Corrected the spelling, but you're right, they make €313 million a year selling products based on quack medicine. Their profit margins must be incredible being as they don't have to do all those awkward trials.

To be honest, when your overheads consist of: Bottles, Tap Water, Sugar in pill form, etc. I don't think they are too worried about profit margins :D
 
Back
Top Bottom